Mailing-List: contact users-help@pdfbox.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@pdfbox.apache.org
From: zhaozhao <zhao.zhao@pactera.com>
To: <users@pdfbox.apache.org>
Subject: Re: About decrypt pdf using pdfbox 2.0.1
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 11:28:28 +0800
Message-ID: <000001d1d66d$5815d460$08417d20$@pactera.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01D1D6B0.66448610"
Thread-Index: AdHWY4Lafzx/6x0fSeySUUAE/wkylg==
Content-Language: zh-cn
Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: pactera.com does not designate
 permitted sender hosts)
SpamDiagnosticOutput: 1:99
SpamDiagnosticMetadata: NSPM
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jul 2016 03:27:48.0919 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HK2PR0301MB1953
archived-at: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 04:54:37 -0000

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01D1D6B0.66448610
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Tilman,

Thanks for your response first.

I upgraded PDFBox from 2.0.1 to 2.0.2. And I tested again using the code I
sent in the last email.

And here are the steps.

1.  Run my code with PDFBox 2.0.2 using the provided pdf file.

2.  [Expected result]

The schema like: ?__^?k_?7

PDTextbox

3.  [What I got]

firstName

PDTextField

Above result is a part. 'firstName'is one field name of the acroform and
'PDTextfield'is the type of the corresponding form component.

And what I really concern is that without decrypting the encrypted pdf file,
can I get correct schema name?

I have shared the pdf file. (password for this file is abcd) 

Please visit this link:
https://drive.google.com/a/tibco.com/file/d/0B2RK53mIzwataGxRVnMtem81cUE/vie
w?usp=sharing 

On 2016-07-02 01:45 (+0800), Tilman Hausherr <T...@t-online.de> wrote: 
> Hello Barry,> 
> 
> - we're already at 2.0.2, so don't bother with 2.0.1 :-)> 
> - please upload your PDF file to a public place (e.g. dropbox, google > 
> drive, or a sharehoster), because attachments are blocked here> 
> - you mention "If I use PDFBox 2.0.1, then I will get the right name of > 
> the form fields" - this sounds like all is ok in 2.0.1, isn't it? Maybe > 
> this is a misunderstanding - please tell us what you get with the > 
> different versions, and explain what you expected.> 
> 
> (The ideal bug report includes 1) what you did, 2) what you expected, 3) >

> what you got instead)> 
> 
> Tilman> 
> 
> 
> Am 01.07.2016 um 11:16 schrieb Barry Zhao [Zhao]:> 
> > Hello team,> 
> >> 
> > I found a weird thing when upgrading pdfbox from 1.8.7 to 2.0.1.> 
> >> 
> > Here is my scenario below.> 
> >> 
> > I used a pdf template which was encrypted. And my code is like below.> 
> >> 
> > /import java.io.File;/> 
> > /import java.io.IOException;/> 
> > /import java.util.List;/> 
> > /import javax.xml.parsers.ParserConfigurationException;/> 
> > /import org.apache.pdfbox.pdmodel.PDDocument;/> 
> > /im 


------=_NextPart_000_0001_01D1D6B0.66448610--