Return-Path: 
 <users-return-6780-apmail-pdfbox-users-archive=pdfbox.apache.org@pdfbox.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-pdfbox-users-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-pdfbox-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8354F1753A
	for <apmail-pdfbox-users-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Fri,  4 Sep 2015 18:52:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 64968 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2015 18:52:23 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-pdfbox-users-archive@pdfbox.apache.org
Received: (qmail 64945 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2015 18:52:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@pdfbox.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@pdfbox.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@pdfbox.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@pdfbox.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.pdfbox.apache.org>
Reply-To: users@pdfbox.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@pdfbox.apache.org
Delivered-To: moderator for users@pdfbox.apache.org
Received: (qmail 59470 invoked by uid 99); 4 Sep 2015 18:50:23 -0000
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.898
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.898 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31
	tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
	HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
	autolearn=disabled
Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new);
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=SRu5YzhhJYVF4f8EuTapCTwtEhSNL2a6B6fHHca9TKA=;
        b=NMDfq3VCdmrjHiNRsBBwz2sZBDUlM5jJn8wekJN9WpLm4j1pIiMXHqZZeS6hbwim9K
         YGhAH+FUhkPxYLL8AsfffEzsIMl0Wd0i5lAy4zRruAgduKoPxK6PbsvuNW2E2vQGsb6u
         sHao6HPsshPVaX4U6NBf6i+HJWzVtKrxmg80qMe+Ig11rB+MKfz8DEgjEWIMIkZggc9O
         xrnsnrNWchksojjnyDvH6VLzgBWGWJjqwyW5+QZ1qGAuanIyqsnYrSl0xEyVDQqopvHf
         KxEGO20WmPu/AT6eBC1xIyr/s9GvbfOhqjJdTxaerUr1LVgDWZHnCBzQ8ZZFLUdGP418
         L4mg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.170.92.3 with SMTP id j3mr5944281yka.7.1441392621186; Fri,
 04 Sep 2015 11:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 14:50:21 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAKSobYYPMNF+GaQG=zOjnhBy7o4Pyepj0kvRjYhNHi+bhu4bPg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Checkbox with multiple AnnotationWidgets
From: Bart Taylor <batayl@gmail.com>
To: users@pdfbox.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=001a113a783e2b9b94051ef05f89

--001a113a783e2b9b94051ef05f89
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113a783e2b9b8e051ef05f87

--001a113a783e2b9b8e051ef05f87
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi,

I have a simple document with two PDCheckbox fields, and one of those
fields has two AnnotationWidgets. I am able to successfully call check() on
the first field and see the result in the output document, but calling
check() on the field with multiple AnnotationWidgets has no effect.

My understanding of duplicated fields is that only a single PDField exists
but that an AnnotationWidget kid will exist for each instance of the field
in the document, so setting the PDField parent once should affect all of
the children. Am I misunderstanding how this should work?

Attached is the document I am testing as well as a small Java class that
reproduces the issue by calling check() on everything in getFields().  I
have tried this with PDFBox 1.8.9, 1.8.10, and the 09/03 Snapshot of 2.0.0.
I am viewing the document with Adobe Acrobat Reader DC Version
2015.008.20082.

Any insight would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Bart.

--001a113a783e2b9b8e051ef05f87
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Hi,<div><br></div><div>I have a simple document with two P=
DCheckbox fields, and one of those fields has two AnnotationWidgets. I am a=
ble to successfully call check() on the first field and see the result in t=
he output document, but calling check() on the field with multiple Annotati=
onWidgets has no effect.</div><div><br></div><div>My understanding of dupli=
cated fields is that only a single PDField exists but that an AnnotationWid=
get kid will exist for each instance of the field in the document, so setti=
ng the PDField parent once should affect all of the children. Am I misunder=
standing how this should work?</div><div><br></div><div>Attached is the doc=
ument I am testing as well as a small Java class that reproduces the issue =
by calling check() on everything in getFields().=C2=A0 I have tried this wi=
th PDFBox 1.8.9, 1.8.10, and the 09/03 Snapshot of 2.0.0. I am viewing the =
document with Adobe Acrobat Reader DC Version 2015.008.20082.</div><div><br=
></div><div><div>Any insight would be appreciated.</div><div><br></div></di=
v><div>Thanks,</div><div>Bart.</div></div>

--001a113a783e2b9b8e051ef05f87--

--001a113a783e2b9b94051ef05f89
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@pdfbox.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@pdfbox.apache.org
--001a113a783e2b9b94051ef05f89--