pdfbox-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Maruan Sahyoun <sahy...@fileaffairs.de>
Subject Re: Checkbox with multiple AnnotationWidgets
Date Wed, 09 Sep 2015 06:22:37 GMT
Hi,

> Am 08.09.2015 um 21:00 schrieb Bart Taylor <batayl@gmail.com>:
> 
> Hi Maruan,
> 
> Thank you for the speedy fix. I built the 1.8 branch and verified that
> check() method works in both single and duplicate field cases. getOnValue()
> also does not return a null pointer exception after the patch.

you're welcome - thanks for testing the fix so quickly.
Maruan

> 
> Thanks again,
> Bart.
> 
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Bart Taylor <batayl@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Maruan,
>> 
>> I was able to verify that the latest trunk snapshot does correct the
>> issue.
>> 
>> I used the latest 1.8.11 snapshot to test the getWidgets() method and set
>> the AppearanceStream for each widget, and that also works as long as I know
>> the exact value to use. Calling the getOnValue() method for the field
>> throws a Null Pointer Exception in PDCheckbox.java at line 140:
>> 
>> COSBase n = ap.getDictionaryObject(COSName.getPDFName("N"));
>> I did not get your response emails, so I cannot reply to the last one in
>> the chain.
>> 
>> Thanks for your help,
>> Bart.
>> 
>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Bart Taylor <batayl@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I have a simple document with two PDCheckbox fields, and one of those
>>> fields has two AnnotationWidgets. I am able to successfully call check() on
>>> the first field and see the result in the output document, but calling
>>> check() on the field with multiple AnnotationWidgets has no effect.
>>> 
>>> My understanding of duplicated fields is that only a single PDField
>>> exists but that an AnnotationWidget kid will exist for each instance of the
>>> field in the document, so setting the PDField parent once should affect all
>>> of the children. Am I misunderstanding how this should work?
>>> 
>>> Attached is the document I am testing as well as a small Java class that
>>> reproduces the issue by calling check() on everything in getFields().  I
>>> have tried this with PDFBox 1.8.9, 1.8.10, and the 09/03 Snapshot of 2.0.0.
>>> I am viewing the document with Adobe Acrobat Reader DC Version
>>> 2015.008.20082.
>>> 
>>> Any insight would be appreciated.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Bart.
>>> 
>> 
>> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@pdfbox.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@pdfbox.apache.org


Mime
View raw message