pdfbox-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brzrk One <brz...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Outline parent with P key
Date Sun, 08 Feb 2015 14:17:01 GMT
Unless of course the P represents common practice, regardless of the spec...

On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 4:49 AM, Tilman Hausherr <THausherr@t-online.de>
wrote:

> Indeed, the P isn't mentioned in the spec. This has been there since 2008,
> and we don't have the prior history. Probably somebody copied code from
> elsewhere. I'll remove it.
> (I think I saw both elsewhere in a PDF, probably annotations)
>
> Re: unit tests, better start small, to see that you don't do work that
> isn't used, and that you get a feeling about what is accepted.
>
> Tilman
>
> Am 07.02.2015 um 15:40 schrieb Andrea Vacondio:
>
>  Hi,
>> I'm trying to become more familiar with PDFBox code and I have a simple
>> use
>> case involving document outline. I decided to start looking at the fairly
>> simple outline package, review it, clean the code a bit keeping an eye on
>> Sonar and write unit tests for that.
>> I was writing unit test for the PDOutlineNode.getParent which gets the
>> parent node looking for a PARENT or a P key in the outline item
>> dictionary.
>> Now according to table 153 of the specs only PARENT should be there so I
>> was wandering if someone knows better why the P is there and if it should
>> be covered by the unit.
>>
>> BTW is it fine if I submit unit tests?
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@pdfbox.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@pdfbox.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message