Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-pdfbox-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-pdfbox-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D1B9F2FF for ; Wed, 29 May 2013 11:43:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42589 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2013 11:43:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-pdfbox-users-archive@pdfbox.apache.org Received: (qmail 42380 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2013 11:43:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@pdfbox.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@pdfbox.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@pdfbox.apache.org Received: (qmail 42358 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2013 11:43:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 May 2013 11:43:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of james.mk.green@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.51 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.128.51] (HELO mail-qe0-f51.google.com) (209.85.128.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 May 2013 11:43:24 +0000 Received: by mail-qe0-f51.google.com with SMTP id nd7so4993345qeb.38 for ; Wed, 29 May 2013 04:43:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+L+r4lVdyeV/UU4DP+T8f752nbMvsiBVaeXwZz/dhVU=; b=MK/RyVIirChFUmQywQeoGsfwaa4ALZXPw0RqdcWgwPShIH16J1knFTYD8fPyKuo21e Jw6kQE7lfoNb35XkG4hkYSrdhRtn1Q30iP7zazP/9FSPGzEIeLqvZfaJa6cPBeTkOz1+ qeciQ62Wc6NNU9PNSCEvouNeQ0jZf0setAfm09GWEEnXQlvmLaHWTCN8Zavi0xrEF4Q1 tI2tpWkUTkAXcrikusyZyEwt5cl+S21YsIYkYhPmAiaPqt4hA5CABJgCUKPhTIylLqik FC5W7S7xM/0GWV9FrvIyWDwOlKiZckP2DNFliL4OJVEKasdBDbSEJTfzJLCvzlESDwA5 mSzA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.205.202 with SMTP id fr10mr2568524qab.48.1369827783358; Wed, 29 May 2013 04:43:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.87.40 with HTTP; Wed, 29 May 2013 04:43:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 12:43:03 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Bad image colours using new overlay code From: James Green To: users Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf300faffb6e3ff904ddd9e2d6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf300faffb6e3ff904ddd9e2d6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 We're seeing an issue where an image's colours are being changed during the use of the new overlay utility. Here's the source: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ysjnow12ulw95pb/source.pdf The overlay: https://www.dropbox.com/s/3akrux8jdv2hstl/WatermarkA4Portrait.pdf And the result of the new overlay: https://www.dropbox.com/s/do7dtm0elxxqxc6/result.pdf Can anyone shed some light onto this? Thanks, James --20cf300faffb6e3ff904ddd9e2d6--