From dev-return-60819-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@pdfbox.apache.org Fri Jan 18 20:27:05 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id A6383180647 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 20:27:04 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 21377 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2019 19:27:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@pdfbox.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@pdfbox.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@pdfbox.apache.org Received: (qmail 21366 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2019 19:27:03 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 19:27:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 40E441808C8 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 19:27:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -110.301 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.301 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ra8X8By5-SOO for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 19:27:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6BA4460FF6 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 19:27:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A30FAE2692 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 19:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 331A925667 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 19:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 19:27:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tres Finocchiaro (JIRA)" To: dev@pdfbox.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-4435) Poor quality printing of PDF label MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-4435?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D167= 46605#comment-16746605 ]=20 Tres Finocchiaro commented on PDFBOX-4435: ------------------------------------------ ... so this is strange... Using Adobe Acrobat and PDFCreator, I printed the= original=C2=A0*label.pdf*=C2=A0to a new PDF, then sent it back through PDF= BOX. * PDFBOX prints without rasterizing (this is not a surprise, the bad data = is stripped out) * The barcode printed in vector.=C2=A0 How is this even possible? Before and after attached...=C2=A0 =C2=A0 !before_after.png! > Poor quality printing of PDF label > ---------------------------------- > > Key: PDFBOX-4435 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-4435 > Project: PDFBox > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Rendering > Affects Versions: 2.0.3, 2.0.13, 2.0.14 > Environment: Lubuntu 16.04, GK420d printer, CL-S400DT(Z) printer > Reporter: David Hancock > Priority: Major > Attachments: before_after.png, label-pdfbox-1-8.jpg, label-pdfbox= -2-0.jpg, label.pdf, label.png > > > Hello, > I'm experiencing poor quality printing of PDF courier labels with PDFBox = when printing from the command line with the following command: > {noformat} > java -jar pdfbox-app-*.jar PrintPDF label.pdf > {noformat} > This makes scanning the QR code on these labels troublesome. > I've tried versions 2.0.3, 2.0.13, 2.0.14 (SNAPSHOT) and all produce the = same quality issue. Interestingly version 1.8.16 does not appear to suffer = from this issue. > I have tried 2 different thermal printers, a GK420d and a CITIZEN CL-S400= DT(Z) and both output the same. > When printing the label directly from the GNOME document viewer (Evince) = the label prints clearly on both printers. > Please find examples of these labels attached. > Can anything be done to prevent these quality issues? > Thanks, > David -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@pdfbox.apache.org