Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-pdfbox-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-pdfbox-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A42A7184CC for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 18:10:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69745 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2015 18:10:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-pdfbox-dev-archive@pdfbox.apache.org Received: (qmail 69707 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2015 18:10:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@pdfbox.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@pdfbox.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@pdfbox.apache.org Received: (qmail 69424 invoked by uid 99); 2 Dec 2015 18:10:11 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 18:10:11 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13EE92C1F70 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 18:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 18:10:11 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sridhar (JIRA)" To: dev@pdfbox.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-3133?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D150= 36282#comment-15036282 ]=20 Sridhar commented on PDFBOX-3133: --------------------------------- Hi John Thanks for you suggestion Tested in a 2 GB machine with 512m and 1g option for -Xmx but no gain in pe= rformance, results below java =E2=80=93Xmx512m -jar pdfbox-2.0.0-RC2.jar PDFToImage -imageType Jpg "= FontTest.PDF" Time taken for Xmx512m: 21.66,19.89,20.11 Time taken for Xmx1g: 20.26,19.77,20.17 Don't know, since there was no performance issue with 4 GB machines even wi= th -Xmx50m ( both my machine and Tilman's machine both having 4 & 8 GBs res= pectively) , looks like below 2GB machines have some issue, either GC or me= mory. > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is= poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: PDFBOX-3133 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-3133 > Project: PDFBox > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: PDModel > Affects Versions: 2.0.0 > Environment: MS Windows Systems with low RAM < 3GB and number of = fonts were less < 592 (or if desired fonts in PDF to be printed are not ava= ilable in local system )=20 > Reporter: Sridhar > Assignee: John Hewson > Labels: performance > Fix For: 2.0.0 > > > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC1, SNAPSHOTS and RC2 versions print takes 15+ seconds. > Steps to reproduce > --------------------------=20 > Use Windows System with < 3 GB RAM > Use Systems with less number of fonts or without specific fonts in PDF fi= le to be printed. > Printing PDF file=20 > Took 14 to 20 seconds in system with 3 GB RAM which had 522 foints > Took 24 to 34 seconds in system with 2 GB RAM which had 90 fonts > Took only 2.5 seconds in system with 8 GB RAM which had 1025 fonts.=20 > Doubt > --------=20 > Not browsed the code, but following is the doubt as causing performance i= ssue. > Though the code caches fonts by storing fonts in local .pdfbox.cache file= first time and caching fonts for subsequent times. > Not clear whether the code updates the pdfbox fonts cache file if new fon= ts are found in new PDF file to be printed, while printing subsequent times= .=20 > If the fonts in PDF file to be printed is not available in the .pdfbox.ca= che file stored in local system/local system what is the behaviour? Will t= he code download fonts and update cache for subsequent times or is it limit= ed by fonts available in local system? Looks like later is the case and pe= rformance got hit either due to RAM or not constantly updating fonts cache = or due to un availability of fonts in local system. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@pdfbox.apache.org