pdfbox-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andreas Lehmkühler (JIRA) <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Closed: (PDFBOX-136) sloooooooooooooooooowwwww.....
Date Thu, 02 Jul 2009 07:48:47 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Andreas Lehmkühler closed PDFBOX-136.
-------------------------------------

    Resolution: Won't Fix

> sloooooooooooooooooowwwww.....
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PDFBOX-136
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-136
>             Project: PDFBox
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Writing
>
> [imported from SourceForge]
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?group_id=78314&atid=552832&aid=1432253
> Originally submitted by mig-o on 2006-02-15 07:53.
> And you just had to replace 
>     public COSStandardOutputStream(OutputStream out)
>     {
>         super( out );
>     }
> by 
>     public COSStandardOutputStream(OutputStream out)
>     {
>         super( new BufferedOutputStream(out,16384) );
>     }
> . Here are some timings for my local drive (i do some
> other stuff for the first 4 seconds...).
> old way: 5103 ms
> new way: 4403 ms 
> On my remote drive:
> old way: 136792 ms
> new way:   4756 ms
> The reason should be clear... Network-packages for
> nearly each and every written byte in the pdf.
> [comment on SourceForge]
> Originally sent by nobody.
> Logged In: NO 
> @previous post: anyone=everyone
> [comment on SourceForge]
> Originally sent by nobody.
> Logged In: NO 
> The bug is, that only the old way exists in the repository,
> so i wrote this, to have someone change this in cvs. 
> Or does anyone has cvs write access here? Then the bug is my
> stupidity, since i could have it done myself :)
> [comment on SourceForge]
> Originally sent by benlitchfield.
> Logged In: YES 
> user_id=601708
> I don't think I understand what the bug is?  If old was was 
> 136 seconds and new way is 4 seconds then what is the 
> problem?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message