orc-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Deepak Majeti <majeti.dee...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Should we release ORC 1.4.0rc1?
Date Thu, 04 May 2017 16:36:14 GMT
+1 (non-binding)

  - verfied checksum and signature
  - built Release and Debug versions on Ubuntu 16.04 with gcc 4.9.4
  - ran C++ and Java tests

On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 4:26 AM, Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> I checked the followings with RC1.
>   - checksum / signature
>   - building and install with 1.4.0 correctly.
>   - unit testing for Java module on Mac/JDK 1.8.0_131
>   - some integration tests with new `nohive` jar for both record/RowBatch
> reader
>
> Everything looks good to me. Thank you for the release!
>
> Bests,
> Dongjoon.
>
> On 2017-05-03 10:13 (-0700), "Owen O'Malley" <owen.omalley@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Ok, I made two mistakes:
> > 1. I didn't update the version in the build to say 1.4.0 instead of
> > 1.4.0-SNAPSHOT.
> > 2. I didn't include the ORC-181 fix.
> >
> > I've rolled a new release candidate.
> >
> > Tag: https://github.com/apache/orc/releases/tag/release-1.4.0rc1
> > Tar ball: http://home.apache.org/~omalley/orc-1.4.0/
> >
> > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Owen O'Malley <owen.omalley@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > All,
> > >    We've been adding some features to ORC and I'd like to make a
> release
> > > before we start on the refactoring of the C++ to add the writer.
> > >
> > > Tag: https://github.com/apache/orc/releases/tag/release-1.4.0rc0
> > > Tar ball: http://home.apache.org/~omalley/orc-1.4.0/
> > >
> > > We should probably roll a 1.3.4 also, to get some of the bug fixes that
> > > have been going in.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >    Owen
> > >
> >
>



-- 
regards,
Deepak Majeti

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message