orc-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Prasanth Jayachandran <j.prasant...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Should we release ORC-1.3.1rc0?
Date Wed, 01 Feb 2017 21:45:29 GMT
+1 for 1.3.1rc0 release artifacts
- Verified checksums, signature and ran rat check
- Built from source and ran unit tests on Mac OS X



Thanks and Regards,
Prasanth Jayachandran


On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Prasanth Jayachandran <
j.prasanth.j@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 on the release.
>
> Although I still feel ORC-135 is important as the default behaviour (PPD
> on) can return incorrect results for timestamp columns. Maybe we can roll
> another quick release after 1.3.1 with ORC-135. This would need backport to
> 1.2.x that disables PPD on timestamp columns (ORC-137).
>
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Prasanth Jayachandran
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Alan Gates <alanfgates@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm +1 to releasing, as I believe Hive 2.next will need ORC-134 and
>> ORC-138.  I don't have enough information to make a call on the risk vs
>> reward for ORC-135.
>>
>> Alan.
>>
>> > On Jan 31, 2017, at 9:06 AM, Owen O'Malley <omalley@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > All,
>> >   We have a couple of bug fixes that have gone in and I think we should
>> > make a release.
>> >
>> > Fixes:
>> > * ORC-134 DecimalColumnStatistics throws NPE when all column values are
>> > null.
>> > * ORC-100 Make findbugs a mandatory part of the build and fixed all of
>> the
>> > current warnings.
>> > * ORC-138 Fix forward port of HIVE-15335 that messed up schema evolution
>> > for decimal.
>> >
>> > The other one that is pending is ORC-135 (predicate pushdown for
>> timestamp
>> > is sensitive to
>> > changing timezones) is important, but I want to be really careful with
>> that
>> > one since it is a
>> > larger change. I'm in the middle of reviewing that one and that one is a
>> > lot riskier change.
>> >
>> > .. Owen
>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message