Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D769200B2B for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 17:17:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 6C2D4160A56; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:17:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id B3F3C160A28 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 17:17:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 6719 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2016 15:17:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@orc.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@orc.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@orc.apache.org Received: (qmail 6698 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2016 15:17:14 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:17:14 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 358921879C3 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:17:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.198 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.198 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y3lzcBzxhiB7 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:17:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pf0-f179.google.com (mail-pf0-f179.google.com [209.85.192.179]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 011CA5FCF7 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:17:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf0-f179.google.com with SMTP id t190so7748577pfb.3 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 08:17:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version; bh=a5ilolST4BvjG/+1Y90fKnlW5MkfNkND4Lc0CKQbOo0=; b=QICM2P+QufWfiI/ViPh8n0nwOw37ptfJBSf0mFqUWCdD4HbNm7r/CX+CGGc8FqBGnz a+17MiSxNt8MeqW6UhVraTmUYLbjcHQwKRImK/Eootr3xlNrxcAdSG6WZVa92WTo/dxy 2LcMh/PmcAi+D7MSULDPn2O8pKcL2LDP0ARyR9NNT5FL93tP0jy9T09mdGuvQigb5L2F Z11jacOfh/fJ/r1trz/PeWYL6c83HHlN81Nk3bwEwgGNEGoRyzoTULyvgZKfJvZF2Gpo nBuyoOEMNGUjb8cDyNbPOIOHo82YrGTI8XGfTQnipFCLaxv7UJ3jDi8tK+Teo3oOleJB vBWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version; bh=a5ilolST4BvjG/+1Y90fKnlW5MkfNkND4Lc0CKQbOo0=; b=TAPvE9nAvGZQkHBJjqaXI+8ymBnFD5euy3Uf+io9ZJ7F1M+Hn3nJ83OGKKv8STQ9gv isaXJMgT99x0a/uEstzr3Q8fuwrqrm0knAOt8qTqjFlXtGZWHeadgY/evs3jTwAbx06Z Fc3iNSQMUKChgn2Yc2c1Bwj6f/yYv5U+huDPwAi9OAg4UBsgOW0XLZqX3StEI+Ec9laD +aYY7tEn1ZMq+RyaovjULncla69Ut3SZuUPtEpOlmguMy4EpA0IqIt76PqNeiAx7/Hba A+EoAj9gbiE/h15D3BJdFkdLBEmT1NZL57AuktsQCvnrPw51I/XkUjVCjPVDTG4Px12H +PIg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIWOY0gZsGW/3rPuhQ1+KbvcVWZSF90DUyoWM/RWpxS8/SCXXgAJoOFTdLnjniVSQ== X-Received: by 10.98.193.1 with SMTP id i1mr2702446pfg.78.1467127031923; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 08:17:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.outlook.com (ec2-52-24-222-228.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com. [52.24.222.228]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w67sm7986834pfw.41.2016.06.28.08.17.10 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Jun 2016 08:17:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:17:10 +0000 (UTC) From: Prasanth Jayachandran To: dev@orc.apache.org, Message-ID: <222D48259388A7CE.E0322D49-7995-4E83-AADF-15F89D83F316@mail.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: Apache ORC vs Hive ORC libraries MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_13029_614284756.1467127030420" X-Mailer: Outlook for iOS and Android archived-at: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:17:16 -0000 ------=_Part_13029_614284756.1467127030420 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Kavinder There is a patch already that removes Orc from Hive and another one that ma= kes Hive depend on Orc 1.1.1 release version. Orc will be removed from Hive= soon.=C2=A0 Thanks Prasanth On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:53 PM -0700, "Kavinder Dhaliwal" wrote: Hi, I'm working on a project that is using the Hive ORC Api for reading files and I'd like to know going forward whether the two libraries will mirror each others functionality or whether the Hive ORC API will be deprecated in favor of using the Apache ORC one? My understanding is that Hive will eventually use the Apache ORC library for its own purposes but am not entirely sure Thanks, Kavinder ------=_Part_13029_614284756.1467127030420--