orc-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Owen O'Malley" <omal...@apache.org>
Subject [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ORC 1.1.0 RC 1
Date Mon, 06 Jun 2016 21:32:27 GMT
Thanks for everyone that has checked out the RC. A user of the C++ library
has privately reported a problem that I am tracking down. I'm cancelling
this vote and will roll a new RC once it is fixed.

.. Owen

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Prasanth J <j.prasanth.j@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 for RC1
>
> - Verified build from src
> - Verified signature and checksum
> - Ran unit tests
>
> Thanks
> Prasanth
>
> > On Jun 3, 2016, at 12:34 PM, Owen O'Malley <omalley@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Chris Douglas <cdouglas@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Going through the Java dependencies, all the licensing looks good
> >> (tukaani:xz is public domain, Objenesis ASLv2, etc.).
> >>
> >> Should the storage API version be set as *-pre-orc? Just curious.
> >>    <storage-api.version>2.1.0-pre-orc</storage-api.version>
> >>
> >
> > Yes, that is deliberate. The storage-api module is a mirror of the Hive
> > storage-api module on branch-2.1 and so the 2.1.0-pre-orc version string
> > was picked so that when Hive releases 2.1.0 maven will automatically pick
> > the 2.1.0 version.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Built and ran tests for both C++/Java (all pass), NOTICE/LICENSE look
> >> good, except the NOTICE contains the following text:
> >> ----
> >> This product includes software developed by Hewlett-Packard:
> >> (c) Copyright [2014-2015] Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P
> >>
> >> This product includes software developed by Hortonworks:
> >> (c) Copyright [2014-2015] Hortonworks, Inc.
> >>
> >> The site formatting includes software developed by Tom Preston-Werner:
> >> (c) Copyright [2008-2015] Tom Preston-Werner
> >> ----
> >>
> >> Are there dependencies that require these? The docs for licensing [1]
> >> stipulate that the NOTICE should not contain any text not legally
> >> required.
> >
> >
> > I can remove the Hortonworks one, but the HP line was a condition imposed
> > by HP
> > before moving the C++ code into Apache. I'll file a jira to remove the
> > Hortonworks line.
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ORC-66
> >
> > .. Owen
> >
> >
> >> -C
> >>
> >> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Matt Burgess <mattyb149@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> I am out of town through Sunday so I won't be able to give the RC a try
> >> before the vote closes, but I've had a good experience with the
> snapshot so
> >> far (the Java part) so I'm looking forward to the release!
> >>>
> >>> One thing I did see, but couldn't characterize enough to file a Jira,
> >> was the setting of a null value into a union column. While the isNull
> entry
> >> appeared to be set correctly in memory, when i wrote the file then read
> it
> >> back in, the isNull entry was false (when it was true right before
> >> writing). I will dig in when I get back; so far all observed errors have
> >> been my own :)
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Matt
> >>>
> >>>> On Jun 2, 2016, at 6:21 PM, Owen O'Malley <omalley@apache.org>
wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Ok, I addressed Prasanth's points and have rolled a new RC.
> >>>>
> >>>> Artifacts: http://home.apache.org/~omalley/orc-1.1.0/
> >>>> Git tag: https://github.com/apache/orc/releases/tag/release-1.1.0rc1
> >>>>
> >>>> Voting will conclude in 72 hours.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>  Owen
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message