From dev-return-4649-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@openwhisk.apache.org Tue Oct 29 16:29:48 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id E82441804BB for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 17:29:47 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 45998 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2019 16:29:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openwhisk.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openwhisk.apache.org Received: (qmail 45987 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2019 16:29:46 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:29:46 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 2E1E2C1414 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:29:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.5 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-ec2-va.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d2eb0e1PJ8Jx for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:29:42 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=groved@us.ibm.com; receiver= Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by mx1-ec2-va.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-ec2-va.apache.org) with ESMTPS id AEB9AC196E for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:29:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x9TGMxUA081528 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 12:29:40 -0400 Received: from smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com (smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com [192.155.248.73]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2vxqj4v5pw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 12:29:40 -0400 Received: from localhost by smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com with smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com ESMTP for from ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:29:39 -0000 Received: from us1a3-smtp01.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com (10.106.154.95) by smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com (10.106.227.90) with smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com ESMTP; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:29:37 -0000 Received: from us1a3-mail91.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com ([10.146.21.47]) by us1a3-smtp01.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com with ESMTP id 2019102916293671-1789994 ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:29:36 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5A64C9D4-1B59-43C6-91BF-0E05649B4E84@adobe.com> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org From: "David P Grove" Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 11:29:35 -0500 References: <5A64C9D4-1B59-43C6-91BF-0E05649B4E84@adobe.com> X-KeepSent: 4863D20F:EE8FADF0-852584A2:005A620A; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: IBM Notes Build V1001FP3_08092019 August 09, 2019 X-LLNOutbound: False X-Disclaimed: 8291 X-TNEFEvaluated: 1 Content-type: multipart/alternative; Boundary="0__=0ABB0E31DFC9E49A8f9e8a93df938690918c0ABB0E31DFC9E49A" Content-Disposition: inline x-cbid: 19102916-8877-0000-0000-000001A0CA91 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: BY=0; FL=0; FP=0; FZ=0; HX=0; KW=0; PH=0; SC=0.417846; ST=0; TS=0; UL=0; ISC=; MB=0.000130 X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00012016; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000292; SDB=6.01282479; UDB=6.00679714; IPR=6.01064629; MB=3.00029292; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-10-29 16:29:38 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unsuspicious REMOTE=unsuspicious XFE=unused X-IBM-AV-VERSION: SAVI=2019-10-29 13:08:33 - 6.00010586 x-cbparentid: 19102916-8878-0000-0000-0000566FE2BA Message-Id: Subject: RE: Action health checks X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-10-29_05:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Reason: safe --0__=0ABB0E31DFC9E49A8f9e8a93df938690918c0ABB0E31DFC9E49A Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Tyson Norris wrote on 10/28/2019 11:17:50 AM: > I'm curious to know what other > folks think about "generic active probing from invoker" vs "docker/ > mesos/k8s specific integrations for reacting to container failures"? > From a pure maintenance and testing perspective I think a single common mechanism would be best if we can do it with acceptable runtime overhead. --dave --0__=0ABB0E31DFC9E49A8f9e8a93df938690918c0ABB0E31DFC9E49A--