openwhisk-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Thomas <jthomas...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: devtools and make-quickstart
Date Fri, 12 Jul 2019 15:53:14 GMT
+1 on the first point. I've seen other issues in the past with the devtools
project based on image versioning stuff.

Given devtools is more for experimental and first-steps than production
usage - switching to the standalone controller seems like a good idea.

On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 at 16:15, Rodric Rabbah <rodric@gmail.com> wrote:

> this issue was opened against devtools and raises an important point:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-devtools/issues/273
>
> "On a separate note, will these builds eventually be versioned or will they
> continue to be tagged in a backwards incompatible way? I am trying to
> create a build process that is deterministic and currently I am unable to
> achieve this."
>
> Given that we're pointing developer to make quick start still as the way to
> startup and some of the dependence in this build on docker latest (now
> nightly), I think we should pin all the dependent images etc and make a
> release available.
>
> An existential question is whether we should use the standalone controller
> which is faster to startup and adapt our docs accordingly.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -r
>


-- 
Regards,
James Thomas

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message