openwhisk-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Thomas <jthomas...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] - prepare to release OpenWhisk catalog
Date Thu, 20 Jun 2019 16:47:21 GMT
+1 to everything Rodric said!

On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 14:07, Rodric Rabbah <rodric@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If the weather package is functional and can run with newer node kinds then I’d favor
keeping it.
>
> I’d favor removing the combinators as we have composer now and we didn’t document
them properly (my fault).
>
> I would consider removing the bash installers since they’re redundant with the wsk
deploy manifest.
>
> I’m indifferent on version number.
>
> -r
>
> > On Jun 17, 2019, at 8:57 AM, David P Grove <groved@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > As Rodric mentioned in [1], the catalog is the last package we need to
> > release before we can start on the main repo.
> >
> > This is a discussion thread to figure out what (if anything) needs to be
> > done before we can start the release process. Here are three questions I
> > have:
> >
> > 1. Should we remove the Weather Company package and let interested users
> > get it from a downstream IBM repo, or is this a generally useful package
> > that we should provide in the Apache release (like Slack and Github)?
> >
> > 2. Should we remove the combinator package? (It is marked as deprecated in
> > the package install scripts).  I think the functionality is now better
> > provided by Apache OpenWhisk composer, but I don't know the full history of
> > this package.
> >
> > 3. Should this release be numbered 0.10.0 or 1.0.0?
> >
> > --dave
> >
> > [1]
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ddf47c05e72426a47f0a414e1dd68cc6075fa4a60be1753318ebfe58@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E



-- 
Regards,
James Thomas

Mime
View raw message