openwhisk-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [REVIEW] draft proposal for TLP project charter and ASF board resolution
Date Thu, 06 Jun 2019 06:27:40 GMT
I tweaked the wording a little Matt wrt faas/serverless.

> should we say anything about supporting Cloud Native (i.e., 12-factors
implied, portable to any Container framework)?

this is a good idea. "serverless" is still new and foreign to people
outside the serverless bubble.

-r

On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 1:56 PM Matt Rutkowski <mrutkowski@apache.org> wrote:

>
>
> On 2019/05/29 19:05:37, Matt Rutkowski <mrutkowski@apache.org> wrote:
> > Dear Whiskers,
> >
> > As a community we have been discussing the possibility of graduation for
> quite some time.  In the wake of the last legal hurdle being cleared (i.e.,
> IBM completed transfer of all trademarks and name registrations to the ASF
> board) and in anticipation of a VOTE thread, I have created a page on our
> CWiki for drafting 2 artifacts we would need to present to the board as
> part of the process, that is the graduated project Charter (simple,
> straightforward) and the Resolution (which references the charter/project
> scope) to become a Top-Level-Project (TLP).
> >
> > I am asking you all, as you did for the Maturity model review, to please
> help develop/review/comment on these items as well:
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=115526932
> >
> > Note that some background and links that describe the process and
> artifacts are included on the page as well.
> >
> > FYI, I brought this up as a topic on the agenda of today's Tech. Int.
> call if you want my unedited "take" on the process and these items:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxxTLBC1QD8
> >
> > Thanks for your help!
> > -Matt
> >
>
> Please check out the charter (simple sentence derived from our CWiki tag
> line) on proposal page and let me know if we should amend it in any way....
> My Qs...
>
> do I need to say FaaS to qualify Serverless?
> should we say anything about supporting Cloud Native (i.e., 12-factors
> implied, portable to any Container framework)?
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message