From dev-return-3338-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@openwhisk.apache.org Sat Mar 16 13:07:20 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 20F41180648 for ; Sat, 16 Mar 2019 14:07:19 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 70644 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2019 13:07:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openwhisk.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openwhisk.apache.org Received: (qmail 70632 invoked by uid 99); 16 Mar 2019 13:07:18 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Mar 2019 13:07:18 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id DF67AC288B for ; Sat, 16 Mar 2019 13:07:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.048 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.048 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ExrS2a4yQZcn for ; Sat, 16 Mar 2019 13:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk1-f172.google.com (mail-qk1-f172.google.com [209.85.222.172]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 5DA7B61160 for ; Sat, 16 Mar 2019 13:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk1-f172.google.com with SMTP id i5so7136994qkd.13 for ; Sat, 16 Mar 2019 06:07:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:subject:message-id :references:in-reply-to:to; bh=JF0Tmld1E4SUqkWu/ML9ZnwkubnydlYk8GTN6zwc4H8=; b=fYdkgBzf2cI2MgwCPZ2q6pdJN61ibvVrJluawy5Orfaa2fIoYhir9VWXDxQe4ehcEJ jLD1CC/Ulxi5JdDaofqvLEaWStP4MSQ1lAZRFgPwR8QFGKmxJSviQet+QM+uudSVituo hSrOof3Qau4lPUNDZm0v3E7Ho1cLfKBwXhaZ3iAYBBiUZ4f6GUNgFlevxVnSrp5bQmEs sJaIowT+0tk1BoZY0YJ1dMwTpGdKXFVHwSaOh/btXU+7yw/I1+bZo8TppzpuW/e5TzFX 9KajSpUAhYBhzNbkzSAvwnuCLU/TYHfujtc0/NEZn3CqS5Ievjo5vNg8IqPjBupdHCF0 Tagg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date :subject:message-id:references:in-reply-to:to; bh=JF0Tmld1E4SUqkWu/ML9ZnwkubnydlYk8GTN6zwc4H8=; b=rIyXjwdCaPVhqvDhxONOTrQ9lTZkcY60yV9iSJpL7Z8orsZlJMt8sAJZWciDk1WkAr 2125j3m7SzDsHky+CQgGU0mCb06M2nL2AABatbQW91JXimY0f8TdB1srm79YFRt3abej xpHzExb/qCDRZHMpnmC9Ua/dHoSR7S8d9NXGOS+4JXlDcTvCtDQTswIi/Fi/aZkm5u5P JXQyEm6LMPfG6xZYC9mT3LWDsVMvqa+KvBls7HgqGt9J4OXr/HHpKGHP6baseWJvWS3R s6gZlBQ7QRBlD0GshPCrFRtEuCIV5ASmxoHnM4/ImECmK9Rv6/EU/QwzY7G6kulGSqn2 jy4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUFGLo2s9tP3mYVXOaIYV6HnlFvM3LYnaQvrmRtxuQARSdisyKI iRIqnJE0jHWHbWBdfOBcw7ZJNFrB X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzKTTtLKuCcqSZMTqH4b6YX0DTpOolt4pCaEunRdEEU6VAM3StM+1VJX+VGsYzQAZloYguvbQ== X-Received: by 2002:a37:c596:: with SMTP id k22mr6690600qkl.18.1552741628981; Sat, 16 Mar 2019 06:07:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.7.172] (75-26-13-100.lightspeed.rlghnc.sbcglobal.net. [75.26.13.100]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g22sm478120qtq.33.2019.03.16.06.07.08 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 16 Mar 2019 06:07:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Carlos Santana Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2019 09:07:07 -0400 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] release openwhisk runtimes Message-Id: <32AE5E84-8071-40B8-986F-DC6CB4D0215A@gmail.com> References: <8c1d3a5a-067f-4478-afd7-0f8e0c6c4ba4@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16D57) At this point I=E2=80=99m ok with what ever plan as long we have a continuou= s train of releases and becomes an easy and habit process=20 the nodejs runtime doesn=E2=80=99t have a hard dependency and doesn=E2=80=99= t need to wait for client-js 3.19.0 I=E2=80=99m ok if Rodric wants to continue with plan release all the runtime= s now.=20 I can signup to do runtimes next release after this wave, for the next wave o= f runtimes I can pick up any changes including nodejs with new client-js and= rust if it=E2=80=99s ready.=20 - Carlos Santana @csantanapr > On Mar 16, 2019, at 8:54 AM, Dave Grove wrote: >=20 > I think we will want to get openwhisk-client-js 3.19.0 into the runtime-no= dejs release. So we need to wait the 2x 72 hours for that release process t= o go through before we can start a release runtime-nodejs. =20 >=20 > Rather than delay the rest of the runtimes for another week+, I think we c= ould break the runtimes into two waves and push ahead with most of the rest o= f them. >=20 > Opinions? Rodric, will you have time to manage a first wave of runtime r= eleases next week? >=20 > --dave >=20