+1 my thoughts exactly.

--dave

Tyson Norris <tnorris@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote on 02/13/2019 04:28:35 PM:
>
> I agree the api_key is bad, when not using e.g. OW npm within the
> action. +1 for using an annotation to enable this.
>
> activation_id is required to do the right thing for logging with
> concurrency enabled - but I'm also not sure what risk it is to
> include that? It will be in the response header anyways still right?
>
> Namespace + action - similar to activation_id, this is already
> available to the client and may have some convenience for action
> devs (especially with logging concurrent actiavitons __ )
>
> From my perspective, I would just change the api_key to be
> explicitly passed, and leave the rest as-is.
>