openwhisk-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vincent S Hou" <s...@us.ibm.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION]: Proposing to use 1.12.0 as the version for all runtimes for the first-time release under Apache
Date Mon, 27 Aug 2018 16:39:01 GMT
For convenience of release management in Apache.
* We can send one or two vote email(s) instead of 6.
* The download page of openwhisk.org can allocate one section to offer the download links
of runtimes.


 
Best wishes.
Vincent Hou (侯胜博)

Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM Cloud

Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: shou@us.ibm.com,
Phone: +1(919)254-7182
Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States

-----Rodric Rabbah <rodric@gmail.com> wrote: -----
To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
From: Rodric Rabbah <rodric@gmail.com>
Date: 08/27/2018 11:45AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION]: Proposing to use 1.12.0 as the version for all runtimes for the
first-time release under Apache

Why do they all need to start from the same version?

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 11:40 AM, Vincent S Hou <shou@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi OpenWhiskers,
>
> We are on our way to release OpenWhisk runtimes under Apache for the first
> time. As you may notice or not, each individual runtime repository has
> already used
> its own version numbers as the build tag for quite a while. In order not
> to disrupt the current versioning number and also accommodating the release
> work under Apache, I would like to propose 1.12.0 as the version number for
> the first time we release the six runtimes under Apache, because this
> version number is the minimum
> nominator I find for all the runtimes so far.
>
> We now have following runtimes, which have already released with their
> version numbers:
> docker skeleton v1.3.3
> python2 v1.0.3
> python3 v.1.0.3
> node8 v1.12.0
> node6 v1.12.0
> php7.2 v1.0.2
> swift4.1 v1.0.8
> java8 v1.1.2
>
> I think 1.12.0 can match them all, and then use it as a common ground to
> move on with further version numbers. I would like to hear your comments.
> If no objection is heard, I will move on with 1.12.0 for the runtimes to
> be released under Apache for the first time.
>
> Best wishes,
> Vincent Hou
>
>
>


Mime
View raw message