From dev-return-2229-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@openwhisk.apache.org Tue Jul 17 22:11:02 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id ABD4E180600 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 22:11:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 31624 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2018 20:11:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openwhisk.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openwhisk.apache.org Received: (qmail 31583 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2018 20:11:00 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 20:10:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 8F4E71A04A4 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 20:10:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.301 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.301 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WAJzyz303TU3 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 20:10:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 25CDE5F175 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 20:10:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Jul 2018 13:10:56 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,366,1526367600"; d="scan'208,217";a="65410102" Received: from fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.205]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Jul 2018 13:10:33 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx154.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.70) by fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.205) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:10:33 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx115.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.136]) by FMSMSX154.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.6.193]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:10:33 -0700 From: "Farwell, James C" To: "dev@openwhisk.incubator.apache.org" Subject: RE: Add support for microkernels instead of containers Thread-Topic: Add support for microkernels instead of containers Thread-Index: AdQd5GpBtReyIjomSj+wDCPu+HlcWgAJcHRg Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 20:10:32 +0000 Message-ID: <48299EF70D223344ABFB8066928BB47D674EBC0C@fmsmsx115.amr.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiYjBiNTZlNmQtYWQ1YS00YTkxLWE5MjYtNzQ4NzhhZWM3NDk5IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoidjNHTmtIZE15UjVwbDlvNW1NbTJjN0JHajZCVEJENkNGSXg4eHhPanZTd2ZXeHZFdnlodkRUTklHNEUrS3dZMSJ9 x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.200.100 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.1.200.107] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_48299EF70D223344ABFB8066928BB47D674EBC0Cfmsmsx115amrcor_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_48299EF70D223344ABFB8066928BB47D674EBC0Cfmsmsx115amrcor_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Markus Thoemmes found my question on StackOverflow, and suggested I post it= here; I am trying to customize OpenWhisk to call a microkernel from the Invoker, = rather than Docker. Is there an effort underway currently to add this suppo= rt, or a development guide covering the changes I would need to make? My cu= rrent understanding of the code is that this will be a substantial project. Is there guidance available on how to move away from the concept of contain= ers? Or will I be better off treating a microkernel as an abstracted type o= f container? Thanks, --James --_000_48299EF70D223344ABFB8066928BB47D674EBC0Cfmsmsx115amrcor_--