openwhisk-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michele Sciabarra <openwh...@sciabarra.com>
Subject Re: MiniWhisk: what you think?
Date Thu, 26 Jul 2018 05:34:41 GMT
I gave a look to the repo but I do not see where the local plugin is
mentioned. Can you provide a link or just mention here what to do to try
this local mode to run Runtimes?
-- 
  Michele Sciabarra
  openwhisk@sciabarra.com



On Thu, Jul 26, 2018, at 3:11 AM, Nick Mitchell wrote:
> With a recent update, the Shell can now be used in a fully
> headless mode.> But one may also leverage the fact that it is an Electron app,
> and hence> you have access to all of chrome as well.
>
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018, 20:11 Rodric Rabbah <rodric@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > https://github.com/ibm-functions/shell
> >
> > -r
> >
> > > On Jul 25, 2018, at 4:10 PM, Michele Sciabarra
> > > <openwhisk@sciabarra.com>> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Sorry for the stupid question but which shell?  bx ? wsk ?
> > >
> > > Because the build part could be implemented using existing
> > > solutions> > (there are many)
> > >
> > > --
> > >  Michele Sciabarra
> > >  openwhisk@sciabarra.com
> > >
> > > ----- Original message -----
> > > From: Nick Mitchell <moosevan@gmail.com>
> > > To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: MiniWhisk: what you think?
> > > Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:35:37 -0400
> > >
> > > the shell indeed has a `local` plugin that does most of this,
> > > though it> > > does not support the `go build` part; but it does take
care of
> > > pulling> > the
> > > base images, injecting code, and routes invokes to and from the
> > container.
> > >
> > > for nodejs, we can also optionally hand the local invocation off
> > > to the> > > chrome debugger.
> >


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, 7-Bit, 0 bytes)
View raw message