openwhisk-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matt Rutkowski" <mrutk...@us.ibm.com>
Subject Re: [Release] Preparing the release of OpenWhisk
Date Wed, 20 Jun 2018 19:04:19 GMT
Agree, Vincent should be first Release Manager.  Do we have a champagne 
bottle somewhere?

Kind regards,
Matt 



From:   Carlos Santana <csantana23@gmail.com>
To:     dev@openwhisk.apache.org
Date:   06/20/2018 01:36 PM
Subject:        Re: [Release] Preparing the release of OpenWhisk



Vincent,

If it's not already clear :-), I think should do the honors, and be 
release
manager for the first release :-)
I'm out most of the month of July (vacation). But will volunteer to do a
release in August

Thread to dev list for vote should have the following Subject "[VOTE]
Release Apache OpenWhisk (incubating) version 0.9.0"
And include the details of the location of the RC, and the instructions 
for
voting including the deadline of 72 hours.

Release Candidate 1 should be located in
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/openwhisk/0.9.0/RC1/

It's a requirement that artifacts need to include the string "incubating"
as part of the version.
Since we are trying to use semantic versioning "incubating" should be at
the end.

dev/incubator/openwhisk/0.9.0/RC1/openwhisk-0.9.0-incubating.tar.gz
dev/incubator/openwhisk/0.9.0/RC1/openwhisk-apigateway-0.9.0-incubating.tar.gz
dev/incubator/openwhisk/0.9.0/RC1/openwhisk-cli-0.9.0-incubating.tar.gz
...

We should remove "incubator", and put "incubating" at the end.
Also I would remove "sources" from the name. Only sources are distributed
on apache servers.
After graduation, we stop using "-incubating"

-cs

On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 1:39 PM Vincent S Hou <shou@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> So far, we can formally name the first version incubator-0.9.0 to 
indicate
> the incubator status as well, and use subversion like rc1, rc2, etc, 
before
> moving the artifacts to the final release SVN URL.
>
> For incubator-0.9.0-rc1, the package of source code openwhisk in the dev
> SVN URL is named after 
openwhisk-apigateway-incubator-0.9.0-sources.tar.gz
> under the folder of apache-openwhisk-incubator-0.9.0-rc1.
>
> Shall we include the name "incubator" as part of the version name? Or it
> does not sound attractive.
>
>
> Best wishes.
> Vincent Hou (侯胜博)
>
> Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM
> Cloud
>
> Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: shou@us.ibm.com,
> Phone: +1(919)254-7182 <(919)%20254-7182>
> Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd
> <
https://maps.google.com/?q=4205+S+Miami+Blvd&entry=gmail&source=g
>
> (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States
>
> -----James Thomas <jthomas.uk@gmail.com> wrote: -----
> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
> From: James Thomas <jthomas.uk@gmail.com>
> Date: 06/20/2018 01:17PM
> Subject: Re: [Release] Preparing the release of OpenWhisk
>
> 0.9 makes sense to me.
>
> Something to think about it - what would constitute a 1.0 release? 
Whilst
> the platform is still evolving rapidly, it has been in production on
> multiple providers for over 12 months. What things would we like to tick
> off before reaching this stage?
>
> On 20 June 2018 at 17:38, Michele Sciabarra <openwhisk@sciabarra.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I agree with 0.9.0
> >
> > --
> >   Michele Sciabarra
> >   openwhisk@sciabarra.com
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018, at 6:37 PM, Michele Sciabarra wrote:
> > > I agree with 0.9.0.
> > >
> > > --
> > >   Michele Sciabarra
> > >   michele@sciabarra.com
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018, at 6:31 PM, Rob Allen wrote:
> > > > On 20 Jun 2018, at 16:24, Matt Rutkowski <mrutkows@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Can we go with 0.9.0?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > 0.9.0 is fine with me.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Rob
> > > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> James Thomas
>
>





Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message