openwhisk-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matt Rutkowski" <mrutk...@us.ibm.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating
Date Thu, 21 Jun 2018 16:08:20 GMT
Hi Bertrand,


>>>> ...Plus a single repo. source is not usable by itself and its build 
dependent
>>>> on the other parts as I mentioned earlier...

>>Right, it if cannot be built that's a problem - but if you say that I
>>suppose there's a build order that must be followed?

>>If that's correct those overall build instructions should be included
>>with the set of release archives.

As required, the main openwhisk README (and supporting) docs include 
instructions on how to build (and tooling that makes it quite easy).  We 
can open an issue to better document suggest manual build order.  Will 
talk to Vincent to see if he has time today as I am leaving soon to return 
Monday.

-mr




From:   Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz@apache.org>
To:     dev@openwhisk.apache.org
Date:   06/21/2018 11:00 AM
Subject:        Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating



Hi Matt,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 5:27 PM Matt Rutkowski <mrutkows@us.ibm.com> 
wrote:
> ...Are you saying you believe the Incubator PMC
> will fail us strictly due to having 13 tgz/tar files vs. 1 for a first
> release?...

I don't know (and someone's welcome to ask on the
general@incubator.a.o list to find out), but that looks unusual to me,
and more work for reviewers that might need to unpack 13 archives to
find similar issues in several of them.

That's why I focused on just one archive here, and found a few
interesting things already - the other 12 archives have not been
useful for my initial review.

> ...Are you saying they need to be "eased into the concept" because we 
will
> have 13 (now and more eventually); at some point the board will be 
exposed
> to multiples...

No, it's just a practical question and fairness for the reviewers,
where multiple archives might not say much more than one about the
readiness of OpenWhisk to make Apache Releases.

The ASF Board is not involved with releases, it's just the Incubator
PMC in this case, for a podling.

> ...Plus a single repo. source is not usable by itself and its build 
dependent
> on the other parts as I mentioned earlier...

Right, it if cannot be built that's a problem - but if you say that I
suppose there's a build order that must be followed?

If that's correct those overall build instructions should be included
with the set of release archives.

-Bertrand






Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message