openwhisk-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Thomas <jthomas...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Release] Preparing the release of OpenWhisk
Date Thu, 21 Jun 2018 18:21:53 GMT
Can we also write up the release process in markdown and store in in the
repo to help future release managers (unless Vincent wants to do it forever
:))?

On 20 June 2018 at 20:59, Vincent S Hou <shou@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Give me the honor to the initiative as the first release manager of
> OpenWhisk.
> The first version is named after "0.9.0-incubating", based on the semantic
> version 2.0.
> I am preparing the email for VOTE now. I will send out the email by the
> end of today.
>
>
>
> Best wishes.
> Vincent Hou (侯胜博)
>
> Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM
> Cloud
>
> Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: shou@us.ibm.com,
> Phone: +1(919)254-7182
> Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United
> States
>
> -----"Matt Rutkowski" <mrutkows@us.ibm.com> wrote: -----
> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
> From: "Matt Rutkowski" <mrutkows@us.ibm.com>
> Date: 06/20/2018 03:05PM
> Subject: Re: [Release] Preparing the release of OpenWhisk
>
> Agree, Vincent should be first Release Manager.  Do we have a champagne
> bottle somewhere?
>
> Kind regards,
> Matt
>
>
>
> From:   Carlos Santana <csantana23@gmail.com>
> To:     dev@openwhisk.apache.org
> Date:   06/20/2018 01:36 PM
> Subject:        Re: [Release] Preparing the release of OpenWhisk
>
>
>
> Vincent,
>
> If it's not already clear :-), I think should do the honors, and be
> release
> manager for the first release :-)
> I'm out most of the month of July (vacation). But will volunteer to do a
> release in August
>
> Thread to dev list for vote should have the following Subject "[VOTE]
> Release Apache OpenWhisk (incubating) version 0.9.0"
> And include the details of the location of the RC, and the instructions
> for
> voting including the deadline of 72 hours.
>
> Release Candidate 1 should be located in
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/openwhisk/0.9.0/RC1/
>
> It's a requirement that artifacts need to include the string "incubating"
> as part of the version.
> Since we are trying to use semantic versioning "incubating" should be at
> the end.
>
> dev/incubator/openwhisk/0.9.0/RC1/openwhisk-0.9.0-incubating.tar.gz
> dev/incubator/openwhisk/0.9.0/RC1/openwhisk-apigateway-0.9.
> 0-incubating.tar.gz
> dev/incubator/openwhisk/0.9.0/RC1/openwhisk-cli-0.9.0-incubating.tar.gz
> ...
>
> We should remove "incubator", and put "incubating" at the end.
> Also I would remove "sources" from the name. Only sources are distributed
> on apache servers.
> After graduation, we stop using "-incubating"
>
> -cs
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 1:39 PM Vincent S Hou <shou@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > So far, we can formally name the first version incubator-0.9.0 to
> indicate
> > the incubator status as well, and use subversion like rc1, rc2, etc,
> before
> > moving the artifacts to the final release SVN URL.
> >
> > For incubator-0.9.0-rc1, the package of source code openwhisk in the dev
> > SVN URL is named after
> openwhisk-apigateway-incubator-0.9.0-sources.tar.gz
> > under the folder of apache-openwhisk-incubator-0.9.0-rc1.
> >
> > Shall we include the name "incubator" as part of the version name? Or it
> > does not sound attractive.
> >
> >
> > Best wishes.
> > Vincent Hou (侯胜博)
> >
> > Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM
> > Cloud
> >
> > Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: shou@us.ibm.com,
> > Phone: +1(919)254-7182 <(919)%20254-7182>
> > Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd
> > <
> https://maps.google.com/?q=4205+S+Miami+Blvd&entry=gmail&source=g
> >
> > (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States
> >
> > -----James Thomas <jthomas.uk@gmail.com> wrote: -----
> > To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
> > From: James Thomas <jthomas.uk@gmail.com>
> > Date: 06/20/2018 01:17PM
> > Subject: Re: [Release] Preparing the release of OpenWhisk
> >
> > 0.9 makes sense to me.
> >
> > Something to think about it - what would constitute a 1.0 release?
> Whilst
> > the platform is still evolving rapidly, it has been in production on
> > multiple providers for over 12 months. What things would we like to tick
> > off before reaching this stage?
> >
> > On 20 June 2018 at 17:38, Michele Sciabarra <openwhisk@sciabarra.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I agree with 0.9.0
> > >
> > > --
> > >   Michele Sciabarra
> > >   openwhisk@sciabarra.com
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018, at 6:37 PM, Michele Sciabarra wrote:
> > > > I agree with 0.9.0.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >   Michele Sciabarra
> > > >   michele@sciabarra.com
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018, at 6:31 PM, Rob Allen wrote:
> > > > > On 20 Jun 2018, at 16:24, Matt Rutkowski <mrutkows@us.ibm.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can we go with 0.9.0?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 0.9.0 is fine with me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Rob
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > James Thomas
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Regards,
James Thomas

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message