From dev-return-1461-apmail-openwhisk-dev-archive=openwhisk.apache.org@openwhisk.apache.org Mon Feb 12 17:40:08 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openwhisk-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openwhisk-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0ACB218F07 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:40:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78436 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2018 17:40:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openwhisk-dev-archive@openwhisk.apache.org Received: (qmail 78386 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2018 17:40:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openwhisk.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openwhisk.apache.org Received: (qmail 78317 invoked by uid 99); 12 Feb 2018 17:40:07 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:40:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 67E271A000F for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:40:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.121 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.121 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iagNAUIt_kAA for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:40:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ua0-f177.google.com (mail-ua0-f177.google.com [209.85.217.177]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 8C0F95F6C8 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:40:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ua0-f177.google.com with SMTP id t6so9931742ual.7 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 09:40:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=LDbEXps8XrXv8xOhiYtVzTRkVXcsSVmEVQ9n/puObBQ=; b=bTO7wmizCZ2eqJuUb5ENpxhepm2+BfGcPL04GJJxwmx74scUhw4eCa83tPrvKZ+mLg jqx8H1NVUZIa4q1PmUC7/vBtLic85XPHe3V5SRsE0TAevUPbECkKATfI70iOaD7iXIv8 b+gvagbIKObDM7KxSCc7i5Aa3dp1g/7VmJvY4pplgftzsKkCJDWAS0N4iamPvhgHk1J9 RPtZMRjx2Rta+Yf8KoQJnbRcL8NA79IvejK5FPx/FneqRiZTgpp6vvaSN2SeQVNLFu6r vSzh0/JqL9EKqJEdKMFwWJHbq584qIP7LcoDXIY/Itn26sjwlHjIOajkNTNLi4j5CD3N IOmA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=LDbEXps8XrXv8xOhiYtVzTRkVXcsSVmEVQ9n/puObBQ=; b=OGeibeRpO8O1C9NXDODxpHdHRDKNywpwg2W+An4tRH2smbRHmeY6ejrXYIt4KE8/Ct bYVM6z1rj0YunUyFtXnKtezDYRZrYCFOibYAGV6Cotq1Knc1d17aCr8Q51s1LPTsEwXt rEchYL6Lz/cCeSpNLRFCr9dc9zHB7a5ZOoFAhvhS4/+yNI3Qo4MZyQ53IGl240vs6225 /sXzg+hLnNkVMnbtJ71jSSlvR1F1bqHaEOA32IIycR8+StJi50ZADYoxR6L3LQgYlpPe LSRATnOQickH4bH+buUbJGPEouNJQZdcCitJlFVCXIBkA0Gd8E3Dso9bcU8vUnjOH30o wldA== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPCqXyq1ueWTzmYFCg6RgGzoliwltF/la2Jpm+jlXSzszZ5YgU7n C5/04CE2pUVv9Zi4yL+oIdkyNBpNYhqx/ru6OO3NOQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227yJ/pIK0uReiBZ5oBABzRevcOA/9wZ3Li3kgyLD+RJ+8fQr5YdepM7XdeZyieBN8cKlVXSfNIK/2DxFPJdcQY= X-Received: by 10.176.70.145 with SMTP id r17mr11970442uaa.47.1518457199228; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 09:39:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.159.37.104 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 09:39:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1518447998.1177584.1268027128.119BD8A8@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1518274333.958012.1266289064.4138ABF6@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1518447998.1177584.1268027128.119BD8A8@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: James Thomas Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:39:58 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: A proposal for a more efficient implementation of Go actions To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On 12 February 2018 at 15:06, Michele Sciabarra wrote: > In my opinion you can have 2 ways of supporting native actions. > One is with the "popen" that will start another process. Another is with the replacement, the one I am trying to implement. It'd be great to run some performance tests once you have created this new runtime to validate the expected performance improvement. -- Regards, James Thomas