openwhisk-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Improving support for UI driven use cases
Date Thu, 06 Jul 2017 11:04:17 GMT
The prototype PR from Tyson was based on a fixed capacity of concurrent activations per container.
From that, I presume once the limit is reached, the load balancer would roll over to allocate
a new container.

-r

> On Jul 6, 2017, at 6:09 AM, Michael M Behrendt <Michaelbehrendt@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Michael,
> 
> thx for checking. I wasn't referring to adding/removing VMs, but rather 
> activation contaIners. In today's model that is done intrinsically, while 
> I *think* in what Dragos described, the containers would have to be 
> monitored somehow so this new component can decide (based on 
> cpu/mem/io/etc load within the containers) when to add/remove containers.
> 
> 
> Thanks & best regards
> Michael

Mime
View raw message