Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openwhisk.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <858032FD-EBD1-4D98-B75D-D932A8F1091B@adobe.com>
 <CAKF+bsoy98jo1ZdQtojY1uOHPOvwk8MoEL8pMy63RPrgeGVVKg@mail.gmail.com> <F33D34A6-072D-4EF9-94A6-20FC669EAD81@adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: <F33D34A6-072D-4EF9-94A6-20FC669EAD81@adobe.com>
From: Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 12:58:31 +0000
Message-ID: <CAKF+bsqfvqG6n+whnwP2_qnB12fuBcAKWBD2jy+T2uy_xNXh4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Pluggable components in OpenWhisk
To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113c5238941e960551eb1cdf"
archived-at: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 12:58:47 -0000

--001a113c5238941e960551eb1cdf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I haven't.  I saw that class and I just wanted to check if a contribution
would be accepted eventually.


I think this would make sense.  Think not only of other messaging providers
but the possibility of integrating with existing messaging solutions on
cloud.

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:51 AM Tyson Norris <tnorris@adobe.com.invalid>
wrote:

> I haven=E2=80=99t heard anyone ask for this, but there is no reason it sh=
ould not
> be possible to extract an interface for messaging; in fact it is mostly
> there already (see whisk.core.connector.MessageProducer), except for the
> binding aspect. Have you already implemented an alternate MessageProducer
> impl?
>
>
> > On Jun 13, 2017, at 6:45 PM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com=
>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Tyson Norris <tnorris@adobe.com.invalid=
>
> wrote:
> >> Hi -
> >> I=E2=80=99ve seen the need for portions of OpenWhisk to be more =E2=80=
=9Cpluggable=E2=80=9D,
> and seen similar comments in GitHub and dev list.
> >>
> >> Some areas I think are worthy of discussion are:
> >> - tracing
> >> - logging
> >> - container management (docker, runc, mesos, swarm, kubernets)
> >> - persistence (couchdb)
> >> - messaging (Kafka) (I haven=E2=80=99t heard any suggestions here, but=
 it
> wouldn=E2=80=99t surprise me)
> >
> >
> > Any plans to make messaging pluggable to other providers beyond Kafka?
>
> --
Clebert Suconic

--001a113c5238941e960551eb1cdf--