openwebbeans-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: OWB-2.0.0 to be released soon
Date Mon, 19 Jun 2017 07:21:38 GMT
IncompatibleClassChangeError, classpath is probably corrupted with an
owb 1.0 dependency somehow



Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
<https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>

2017-06-19 8:19 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>:

> Oh txs for the catch, will check.
>
> LieGrue,
> Strub
>
> Am 19.06.2017 um 04:47 schrieb John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>:
>
> Hmm so DeltaSpike is seeing 11 test failures with OWB2.
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/DeltaSpike/job/
> DeltaSpike%20OWB%202.0.0/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/
>
> CDI Ctrl Servlet - it looks like a weird error, the impl of this bean
> hasn't been changed in 2 years.  Not sure if this is a new validation in
> place.
>
> ClasspathResourceTest - I'm not sure if the path is getting skewed due to
> duplicate resources, or the same resource being added multiple times.
>
> JSF & Scheduler look like changes in the dependency structure.  If on
> purpose, I'll push up a fix sometime tomorrow.
>
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 10:04 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> 2 things to check before the release:
>>
>> 1. se API (not covered by tck and poorly covered by us ATM)
>> 2. the fastMatching flag should get removed if we can (created due to 1
>> tck)
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
>>
>> 2017-06-18 15:41 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>:
>>
>>> OWB itself did always ignore it and log a warning. This code did not get
>>> changed for a while.
>>>
>>> But we have/had a bug in the arquillian connector which lead to blowing
>>> up on NoClassDefFound.
>>> I need to check whether we fixed this already with another commit.
>>>
>>> The ticket is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1179
>>>
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > Am 18.06.2017 um 13:45 schrieb John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>:
>>> >
>>> > Just wondering, did you change the behavior when a class isn't found to
>>> > ignore the bean? Prior versions of OWB would throw an exception.
>>> >
>>> > John
>>> >
>>> > On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 4:43 PM Mark Struberg <
>>> struberg@yahoo.de.invalid>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Yes, it should 'just work' afaict.
>>> >> We even kept the SPI the same.
>>> >> We most likely will add an async event related API for better
>>> integration
>>> >> within TomEE in the future.
>>> >> But this should still be perfectly backward compatible as OWB will
>>> provide
>>> >> a default implementation anyway!
>>> >>
>>> >> If you catch any (unexpected) problems then just ping us.
>>> >>
>>> >> txs and LieGrue,
>>> >> strub
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>> Am 17.06.2017 um 22:36 schrieb John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org
>>> >:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> So... just to confirm.  Outside of changing the geronimo specs,
>>> taking a
>>> >> OWB 1.x profile that I may have will just work with OWB 2?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> John
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 1:53 PM Mark Struberg <
>>> struberg@yahoo.de.invalid>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>> Yes, it is 1:1 backward compatible.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> The only thing you need to update is the jcdi and common-annotations
>>> API:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> <dependency>
>>> >>>    <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
>>> >>>    <artifactId>geronimo-annotation_1.3_spec</artifactId>
>>> >>>    <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
>>> >>> </dependency>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> <dependency>
>>> >>>    <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
>>> >>>    <artifactId>geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec</artifactId>
>>> >>>    <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
>>> >>> </dependency>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> They will be released this week as well.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> LieGrue,
>>> >>> strub
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> Am 17.06.2017 um 19:41 schrieb Ludovic Pénet <l.penet@senat.fr>:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Is it a drop i' remplacement ?
>>> >>>> If yes, I would gladky test this works, before test driving
the new
>>> >> features.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Ludovic
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Le 17 juin 2017 19:38:01 GMT+02:00, Mark Struberg <
>>> struberg@yahoo.de>
>>> >> a écrit :
>>> >>>> Hi folks!
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> We are finished with implementing all CDI-2.0 features and now
>>> >> successfully pass the standalone TCK!
>>> >>>> A recent owb-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT is deployed to the Apache Snapshots
>>> >> repository [1].
>>> >>>> This get's deployed via Jenkins each night.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> It would be great if you could try it out and give us some feedback!
>>> >>>> We gonna release it somewhen next week.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>> >>>> strub
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> --
>>> >>>> Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser
ma
>>> >> brièveté.
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>>

Mime
View raw message