openwebbeans-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
Subject RE: OWB-2.0.0 to be released soon
Date Sat, 17 Jun 2017 21:43:15 GMT
Side note: we already have the async spi ;)

Le 17 juin 2017 23:10, "Steve Sobol - Lobos Studios" <steve@lobosstudios.com>
a écrit :

> I have had some good success with OWB and JSF running on Jetty. There are
> two projects where I'd be happy to use 2.0, but both are still under
> development and I don't know how much useful feedback I can offer.
>
> --
> Lobos Studios | Phone: 877.919.4WEB | LobosStudios.com |
> Facebook.com/LobosStudios | @LobosStudios
> Web Development - Mobile Development - Helpdesk/Tech Support - Computer
> Sales & Service
> Acer Authorized Reseller - Computers, Windows and Android Tablets,
> Accessories
>
> Steve Sobol - CEO, Senior Developer and Server Jockey
> steve@LobosStudios.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Struberg [mailto:struberg@yahoo.de]
> Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2017 13:43
> To: openwebbeans-user <user@openwebbeans.apache.org>
> Cc: openwebbeans-dev <dev@openwebbeans.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: OWB-2.0.0 to be released soon
>
> Yes, it should 'just work' afaict.
> We even kept the SPI the same.
> We most likely will add an async event related API for better integration
> within TomEE in the future.
> But this should still be perfectly backward compatible as OWB will provide
> a default implementation anyway!
>
> If you catch any (unexpected) problems then just ping us.
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 17.06.2017 um 22:36 schrieb John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>:
> >
> > So... just to confirm.  Outside of changing the geronimo specs, taking a
> OWB 1.x profile that I may have will just work with OWB 2?
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 1:53 PM Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de.invalid>
> wrote:
> > Yes, it is 1:1 backward compatible.
> >
> > The only thing you need to update is the jcdi and common-annotations API:
> >
> > <dependency>
> >     <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
> >     <artifactId>geronimo-annotation_1.3_spec</artifactId>
> >     <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
> > </dependency>
> >
> > <dependency>
> >     <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
> >     <artifactId>geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec</artifactId>
> >     <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
> > </dependency>
> >
> > They will be released this week as well.
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> > > Am 17.06.2017 um 19:41 schrieb Ludovic Pénet <l.penet@senat.fr>:
> > >
> > > Is it a drop i' remplacement ?
> > > If yes, I would gladky test this works, before test driving the new
> features.
> > >
> > > Ludovic
> > >
> > > Le 17 juin 2017 19:38:01 GMT+02:00, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> a écrit :
> > > Hi folks!
> > >
> > > We are finished with implementing all CDI-2.0 features and now
> successfully pass the standalone TCK!
> > > A recent owb-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT is deployed to the Apache Snapshots
> repository [1].
> > > This get's deployed via Jenkins each night.
> > >
> > > It would be great if you could try it out and give us some feedback!
> > > We gonna release it somewhen next week.
> > >
> > > txs and LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> > >
> > > [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/
> > >
> > > --
> > > Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma
> brièveté.
> >
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message