Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openwebbeans-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openwebbeans-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E2CE4183B1 for ; Thu, 28 May 2015 20:52:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36550 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2015 20:52:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openwebbeans-user-archive@openwebbeans.apache.org Received: (qmail 36523 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2015 20:52:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@openwebbeans.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@openwebbeans.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@openwebbeans.apache.org Received: (qmail 36513 invoked by uid 99); 28 May 2015 20:52:40 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 May 2015 20:52:40 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 19CDE1A39B7 for ; Thu, 28 May 2015 20:52:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.009 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.009 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OnYSRkxme8Ih for ; Thu, 28 May 2015 20:52:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from buster.senat.fr (buster.senat.fr [95.143.74.16]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1BF4D453C8 for ; Thu, 28 May 2015 20:52:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by buster.senat.fr (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4SKsUUE033056 for ; Thu, 28 May 2015 22:54:30 +0200 Received: from klebs.senat.fr (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB0961BA9BF for ; Thu, 28 May 2015 22:52:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from truman.senat.fr (unknown [192.168.51.11]) by klebs.senat.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD261BA9BA for ; Thu, 28 May 2015 22:52:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from chester.senat.fr (authenticated bits=0) by truman.senat.fr (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4SKrmMF028279 for ; Thu, 28 May 2015 22:53:48 +0200 Received: from 109.190.153.217 (SquirrelMail authenticated user lpenet) by webmail.senat.fr with HTTP; Thu, 28 May 2015 22:52:22 +0200 Message-ID: <2a45f4f35c529bd28b8fc71423472645.squirrel@webmail.senat.fr> In-Reply-To: References: <555EE588.2060405@senat.fr> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 22:52:22 +0200 Subject: Re: omnifaces and openwebbeans From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22P=C9NET_LUDOVIC=22?= To: user@openwebbeans.apache.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-8.5.0.1516-8.0.0.1202-21576.002 X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-8.5.0.1516-8.0.1202-21576.002 X-TMASE-Result: 11-16.962900-5.000000 X-TMASE-MatchedRID: y/2oPz6gbvhzgDEqoQagetjko+KiQPUGVBDQSDMig9FGMe+tDjQ3Fn/2 0wqGUabSMQz6Lj18cktheu63zsteyBGRuqAmkM32BEfU2vugRF0GEw2Hv3TsN83J+h/wWLV9KPn doQHmoMvQU462wJTDJ4lG9rZ8w+7GVQ7O/4REy+stR8fVMTBo3dMNeBxSUI2j+Cckfm+bb6Dnan y7O4hLNRBxqcioKvQnrePSS/q/kdwVnLoTgKrjJpLktajbF9ff4DVnGFyBvKV5whhW4v46zEsIx i34LbJSy/MLT8DZLgio93IsvrrBKg+NGlHAVClUngIgpj8eDcBjZ/Fz4gCyG/oA9r2LThYYKrau Xd3MZDXe3fcRMtmdzgQbq2Fs8pjmwI6rxEy13hAWgBgJJpcGjsZ7nH1ZMvpnFtZUe4pGwNW7LMd OWFAsGbXwUk0Z4hmf0Tuc6XoLBazoanMAGP3B4utpDJoZe2Pqeu6f/S8Dhtt+ifRQ9MxYjQNh3N wVhDk7QwymtxuJ6y0= For archive and people who might land on this thread when searching for this problem... It is solved in omnifaces-2.1-SNAPSHOT and should be available in the release next to RC2. Thanks a lot to BalusC and Mark Struberg for their kind help. https://github.com/omnifaces/omnifaces/issues/133 If I may add one last question : one of the issue was that injection was not performed in @WebFilter-s. Is there some specific configuration to activate so that it works ? Ludovic Karl Kildén a �crit : > A bit surprising to me since I ran TomEE 7.0 snapshot (or maybe 2.0 can't > remember if it was before or after version bump) with java 8 and omni 2.0 > > I have no idea of why this happens though > > On 22 May 2015 at 10:15, l.penet@senat.fr wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> I have some trouble with omnifaces and openwebbeans. >> >> Omnifaces versions prior to 2.0 work (at least for the non-CDI related >> part I use), but with error logs at startup. >> >> Versions 2.0 prevent the application from starting. >> >> It seems to me that it is because omnifaces is starting too early, >> before >> OWB is ready. >> >> I asked a long question on this topic on stackoverflow, as it is the >> best >> way to get in touch with omnifaces autho, BalusC. >> >> >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/30385007/omnifaces-starting-before-openwebbeans-1-5-0?noredirect=1#comment48860074_30385007 >> >> I am considering patching omnifaces... But before doing that, I wondered >> whether hot shot developper usually kindly helping on this list have on >> opinion on why it works on TomEE and why it does not in Tomcat 8 + >> openwebbeans-tomcat7 module. >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> Ludovic >> | >> | AVANT D'IMPRIMER, PENSEZ A L'ENVIRONNEMENT. >> | >> >> > -- | | AVANT D'IMPRIMER, PENSEZ A L'ENVIRONNEMENT. |