openwebbeans-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <itsme...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: @SessionScoped and @ConversionScoped
Date Wed, 04 Dec 2013 08:56:22 GMT
Hi

I'm putting together a mail to our technical contact at IBM about this.
Does OWB have some pages describing its implementation of the SPI for fail
over?

Regards
Lars-Fredrik


On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Joseph Bergmark <bergmark@gmail.com> wrote:

> It sounds like the Websphere  documentation in this area isn't sufficient
> to answer your questions.  It might be appropriate to open a PMR to get
> these details explained and perhaps added to the info center.
>  On Nov 28, 2013 6:20 AM, "Lars-Fredrik Smedberg" <itsmeden@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mark
>>
>> Can you see if IBM did implement their own FailOverService or if they use
>> the DefaultOwbFailOverService? If they implemented their own is the
>> settings for failover and passivation (in openwebbeans.properties) still
>> valid? Do you know any of their implementation detail?
>>
>> Regads
>> Lars-Fredrik
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I just know from my IBM key accounter that liberty does not provide
>>> enterprise management nor clustering. It's more targeted for sticky session
>>> spread out stuff. Joe might probably be able to help.
>>>
>>> (I personally most of the times combine sticky session with session
>>> replication via MSM, but that's another story).
>>>
>>>
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> >________________________________
>>> > From: Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <itsmeden@gmail.com>
>>> >To: user@openwebbeans.apache.org; Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
>>> >Sent: Wednesday, 27 November 2013, 22:53
>>> >Subject: Re: @SessionScoped and @ConversionScoped
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >Hi Mark
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >In development we are using WebSphere Liberty Profile 8.5.1. For
>>> production I need to check the version and get back to you with that....
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >Do you have any suggestion on how I can verify the setup in the
>>> production WebSphere..?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >Do you know what kind of setup the Liberty Profile comes with?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >Regards
>>> >Lars-Fredrik
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >>Well the point is that in WebSphere all those settings and modules
>>> should already be set up correctly.
>>> >>Of course this is if you use a WebSphere edition (enterprise) which
>>> supports clustering at all. Is this the case Lars-Fredrik? Or are you using
>>> e.g. the dev edition or even liberty-profile?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>We did all the SPI stuff for allowing container integrators and
>>> extension builders for going the most flexible route. And to allow to build
>>> a container yourself (e.g. by just taking tomcat + tweaking stuff yourself).
>>> >>Otoh if you use a Container like WebSphere or TomEE, then you usually
>>> don't need to tweak anything!
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>LieGrue,
>>> >>strub
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>>________________________________
>>> >>> From: Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>
>>> >>>To: user@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>> >>>Sent: Wednesday, 27 November 2013, 21:41
>>> >>
>>> >>>Subject: Re: @SessionScoped and @ConversionScoped
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>>Since 1.2.0, you actually only need the clustering module +
>>> registering the FailOverFilter in the web.xml.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>Sorry but i don't know about WebSphere, you should ask the WebSphere
>>> developer.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>2013/11/27 Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <itsmeden@gmail.com>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>@Thomas
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>So if I understand it correct, if I want to use the distributed
>>> session management in WebSphere I would need to configure the
>>> FailOverService and set issupportfailover to true ?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>Is that how it is configured in WebSphere out-of-the-box? If
not how
>>> can I do that and how can I verify the setup? Is it logged at startup?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>Regards
>>> >>>>Lars-Fredrik
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Thomas Andraschko <
>>> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>We have 2 flags in OWB: issupportfailover and issupportpassivation
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>issupportpassivation only stores the beans in the session
on
>>> passivation.
>>> >>>>>issupportfailover stores the beans after each request.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>--
>>> >>>>Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
>>> >>>>The information contained in this electronic message and any
>>> >>>>attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use
of the
>>> >>>>address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information.
>>> If
>>> >>>>you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik
>>> Smedberg
>>> >>>>immediately at itsmeden@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of
this
>>> >>>>message and any attachments.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >--
>>> >Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
>>> >
>>> >Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
>>> >
>>> >STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
>>> >The information contained in this electronic message and any
>>> >attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
>>> >address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
>>> >you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
>>> >immediately at itsmeden@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of this
>>> >message and any attachments.
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
>>
>> Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
>>
>> STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
>> The information contained in this electronic message and any
>> attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
>> address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
>> you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
>> immediately at itsmeden@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of this
>> message and any attachments.
>>
>


-- 
Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards

Lars-Fredrik Smedberg

STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
The information contained in this electronic message and any
attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
immediately at itsmeden@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of this
message and any attachments.

Mime
View raw message