Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openwebbeans-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openwebbeans-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E810C108BF for ; Wed, 8 May 2013 14:15:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27481 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2013 14:15:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openwebbeans-user-archive@openwebbeans.apache.org Received: (qmail 26336 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2013 14:15:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@openwebbeans.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@openwebbeans.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@openwebbeans.apache.org Received: (qmail 26287 invoked by uid 99); 8 May 2013 14:15:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 May 2013 14:15:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rmannibucau@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.180] (HELO mail-ie0-f180.google.com) (209.85.223.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 May 2013 14:15:20 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id ar20so3210001iec.39 for ; Wed, 08 May 2013 07:14:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=5PRWB7nqOHfvb/z+XMmxp3XqksF9re2KYdYY4v3d3BQ=; b=RF7K351bpWYuHriGot2MA4x+0pkxHHDfBmtfuAVWwX6GobetjvZicM8XYjE9MwulGw zm41f6nfv91nwCWOE5HU2W0Cy/+VoQTE+2CeTYKRGVilwy9eVPpCdNdx+X/GK4h1wXuW Zl2RkqtQaYAmu0/g1MUpEPmG/41VrE/htUHyeGtclnf7yftb9XByXBhGAPJRke4Kmfil t2rAeJqhczCnyWeMek8KewjBhuQhzXy1DODX9nQK1AGDuHoyfKVBr7uQ+YjLb1TMY+VO IQFixbdTG1W0jJZAwwDRLnb+1/orAAg37qPCT+T87oviIOKUq7EqROPyEKqhAslS6mpJ 09Ng== X-Received: by 10.50.120.102 with SMTP id lb6mr2588719igb.103.1368022499049; Wed, 08 May 2013 07:14:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.27.130 with HTTP; Wed, 8 May 2013 07:14:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3B55F535-97C3-4CCD-87C6-0F06893C24D0@openknowledge.de> References: <1367963547.74441.YahooMailNeo@web28903.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <3B55F535-97C3-4CCD-87C6-0F06893C24D0@openknowledge.de> From: Romain Manni-Bucau Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 16:14:38 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0 To: user@openwebbeans.apache.org Cc: Mark Struberg , openwebbeans-dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd756de1a188b04dc358f76 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7bd756de1a188b04dc358f76 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 side note: seems we still include javassist licences http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/orgapacheopenwebbeans-016/licenses.html, is it intended? *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau * *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/* *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2013/5/8 Jens Schumann > Even though I have no vote to offer I am at +1 since 1.2.0 improves a lot > around interceptors (for observer methods and even life cycle callbacks) if > applied during ProcessAnnotatedType. In 1.1.x I encountered strange > situations where it sometimes worked and sometimes not. From what I > understood it was related to the order classes where processed. > > So thanks for improving 1.2.0 internally a lot. > > Jens > > > > On 07.05.2013, at 23:53, "Mark Struberg" wrote: > > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0 . > > > > This is the first release of the OpenWebBeans-1.2.x branch. > > This release changed many internal mechanics but still targets > > the CDI-1.0 specification. > > > > Please note that the source binary containes a few non-enabled modules > like > > webbeans-cdi11. They do pass RAT though. > > > > > > The ReleaseNotes are available online: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310844&version=12315461 > > > > Maven staging repo: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-016/ > > > > SVN source tag: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.2.0/ > > > > Source Release: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-016/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.2.0/openwebbeans-1.2.0-source-release.zip > > > > Binary release: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-016/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans-distribution/1.2.0/openwebbeans-distribution-1.2.0-binary.zip > > > > PGP release key 2FDB81B1 > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS > > > > The VOTE will be open for 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 veto (and reason why) > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > --047d7bd756de1a188b04dc358f76 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1

side note: seems we still include javassist licences= =A0http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/orgapacheopenwebbea= ns-016/licenses.html, is it intended?

Romain Manni-Bucau
Twi= tter: @rmanni= bucau


2013/5/8 Jens Schumann <je= ns.schumann@openknowledge.de>
Even though I have no vote to offer I am at +1 since 1.2.0 improves a lot a= round interceptors (for observer methods and even life cycle callbacks) if = applied during ProcessAnnotatedType. In 1.1.x I encountered strange situati= ons where it sometimes worked and sometimes not. From what I understood it = was related to the order classes where processed.

So thanks for improving 1.2.0 internally a lot.

Jens



On 07.05.2013, at 23:53, "Mark Struberg" <struberg@yahoo.de> wrote:

> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0 . >
> This is the first release of the OpenWebBeans-1.2.x branch.
> This release changed many internal mechanics but still targets
> the CDI-1.0 specification.
>
> Please note that the source binary containes a few non-enabled modules= like
> webbeans-cdi11. They do pass RAT though.
>
>
> The ReleaseNotes are available online:
> https://issues.a= pache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=3D12310844&version=3D1= 2315461
>
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content= /repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-016/
>
> SVN source tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbean= s/tags/openwebbeans-1.2.0/
>
> Source Release:
> https://repository.apache.org/co= ntent/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-016/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwe= bbeans/1.2.0/openwebbeans-1.2.0-source-release.zip
>
> Binary release:
> https://reposi= tory.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-016/org/apache/o= penwebbeans/openwebbeans-distribution/1.2.0/openwebbeans-distribution-1.2.0= -binary.zip
>
> PGP release key 2FDB81B1 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/op= enwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
>
> The VOTE will be open for 72 hours.
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 veto (and reason why)
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>

--047d7bd756de1a188b04dc358f76--