openwebbeans-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Arne Limburg <arne.limb...@openknowledge.de>
Subject Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0
Date Thu, 09 May 2013 11:07:52 GMT
Damn, this is a
-1
for me, sorry

Then we should fix the license issue, too.

Von: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com<mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com>>
Antworten an: "user@openwebbeans.apache.org<mailto:user@openwebbeans.apache.org>" <user@openwebbeans.apache.org<mailto:user@openwebbeans.apache.org>>
Datum: Mittwoch, 8. Mai 2013 16:16
An: "user@openwebbeans.apache.org<mailto:user@openwebbeans.apache.org>" <user@openwebbeans.apache.org<mailto:user@openwebbeans.apache.org>>
Cc: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de<mailto:struberg@yahoo.de>>, openwebbeans-dev
<dev@openwebbeans.apache.org<mailto:dev@openwebbeans.apache.org>>
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0

oops, missed: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.2.0/webbeans-cdi11/pom.xml
-> the parent is not correct


Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau<https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau



2013/5/8 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com<mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com>>
+1

side note: seems we still include javassist licences http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/orgapacheopenwebbeans-016/licenses.html,
is it intended?

Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau<https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau



2013/5/8 Jens Schumann <jens.schumann@openknowledge.de<mailto:jens.schumann@openknowledge.de>>
Even though I have no vote to offer I am at +1 since 1.2.0 improves a lot around interceptors
(for observer methods and even life cycle callbacks) if applied during ProcessAnnotatedType.
In 1.1.x I encountered strange situations where it sometimes worked and sometimes not. From
what I understood it was related to the order classes where processed.

So thanks for improving 1.2.0 internally a lot.

Jens



On 07.05.2013, at 23:53, "Mark Struberg" <struberg@yahoo.de<mailto:struberg@yahoo.de>>
wrote:

> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0 .
>
> This is the first release of the OpenWebBeans-1.2.x branch.
> This release changed many internal mechanics but still targets
> the CDI-1.0 specification.
>
> Please note that the source binary containes a few non-enabled modules like
> webbeans-cdi11. They do pass RAT though.
>
>
> The ReleaseNotes are available online:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310844&version=12315461
>
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-016/
>
> SVN source tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.2.0/
>
> Source Release:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-016/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.2.0/openwebbeans-1.2.0-source-release.zip
>
> Binary release:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-016/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans-distribution/1.2.0/openwebbeans-distribution-1.2.0-binary.zip
>
> PGP release key 2FDB81B1 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
>
> The VOTE will be open for 72 hours.
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 veto (and reason why)
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>



Mime
View raw message