Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openwebbeans.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rmannibucau@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.215.50 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1354019981.23544.YahooMailNeo@web121506.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
References: <D9CFA20A-8180-4A50-B9CD-14825DF88D63@gmail.com>
 <1354011561.51950.YahooMailNeo@web121505.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
 <1354017086.23977.YahooMailNeo@web28906.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
 <1354018517.78446.YahooMailNeo@web121503.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
 <CACLE=7O_DnR74jecCGwN84pdR4_q1dxL7V9-qNA_p2FiYSrY3g@mail.gmail.com>
 <1354019148.21763.YahooMailNeo@web121503.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
 <1354019715.68606.YahooMailNeo@web28902.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
 <1354019981.23544.YahooMailNeo@web121506.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 13:40:53 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CACLE=7Ozq_2pXYwN=AdcYXQx0UQqGjTD8o4DZ4jYmK+07aFDGg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Thoughts on OWB 1.1.7 ?
To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org, Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com>
Cc: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e0cb4efe33808653be04cf795d8f

--e0cb4efe33808653be04cf795d8f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-9
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thks Gurkan!

*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.co=
m/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*


2012/11/27 Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com>

> Done.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Gurkan
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>  Kimden: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> Kime: "dev@openwebbeans.apache.org" <dev@openwebbeans.apache.org>
> G=F6nderildi=F0i Tarih: 27 Kas=FDm 2012 14:35 Sal=FD
> Konu: Re: Thoughts on OWB 1.1.7 ?
>
> both commits are pure bugfixes and perfectly fine to be ported back to
> 1.1.7 imo. Please commit them Gurkan
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> >________________________________
> > From: Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com>
> >To: "dev@openwebbeans.apache.org" <dev@openwebbeans.apache.org>
> >Cc: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> >Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:25 PM
> >Subject: Re: Thoughts on OWB 1.1.7 ?
> >
> >
> >r1409751, r1409721 not ported to 1.1.x branch.  Mark, are you able to
> port this?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >________________________________
> > Kimden: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> >Kime: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org; Gurkan Erdogdu <
> gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com>
> >Kopya: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> >G=F6nderildi=F0i Tarih: 27 Kas=FDm 2012 14:18 Sal=FD
> >Konu: Re: Thoughts on OWB 1.1.7 ?
> >
> >think only 1409721 was not ported, no?
> >
> >*Romain Manni-Bucau*
> >*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> >*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> >*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> >*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >2012/11/27 Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com>
> >
> >> Hi Mark
> >>
> >> Yeah I get your point! I do not mean that we have to port module chang=
es
> >> to 1.1.x branch. I just
> want to have other fixes that I mentioned in
> >> previous email in 1.1.x branch. If we will not commit these fix to
> branch,
> >> these fixes had already been committed to the 1.2.0 TRUNK, we can
> release
> >> 1.2.0.M1 before changing lots of the things in TRUNK.  For Siwpas, the=
se
> >> fixes are very important.
> >>
> >>
> >> Gurkan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >>  Kimden: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> >> Kime: "dev@openwebbeans.apache.org" <dev@openwebbeans.apache.org>
> >> G=F6nderildi=F0i Tarih: 27 Kas=FDm 2012 13:51 Sal=FD
> >> Konu: Re: Thoughts on OWB 1.1.7 ?
> >>
> >> Hi
> Gurkan!
> >>
> >> I think we should _not_ port back all changes we did on trunk. That
> would
> >> make the maintenance branch worthless.
> >> I would e.g. not port back the SPI and module changes because that mea=
ns
> >> it's not a drop-in replacement anymore. I have not looked at the
> >> webbeans-cluster stuff right now. If this is not needed for most users
> >> which do not use fail-over then I can imagine that it might be ok for
> 1.1.7
> >> as well. It should at least be drop in for most of our users.
> >>
> >>
> >> Before heading to release 1.2.0 I would like to fix our Security stuff
> >> with commons-privilizer.
> >>
> >>
> >> There are for sure a few things we need to fix in both branches. E.g.
> >> making the Producers stateless and remove the CreationalContext from
> them.
> >>
> >>
> >> How do we handle this in JIRA?
> >> I propose to create a bug report for 1.2.0 and then create a clone
> for
> >> 1.1.7 just for tracking commits and to be able to get a clean release
> >> report. wdyt?
> >>
> >> Please tell us your preferences for doing a 1.2.0 release.
> >> So far we are still on CDI-1.0, releasing 1.2.0 with CDI-1.0 and later
> >> moving to 1.1 sounds a bit weird imo.
> >>
> >> LieGrue,
> >> strub
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> > From: Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com>
> >> > To: "dev@openwebbeans.apache.org" <dev@openwebbeans.apache.org>
> >> > Cc:
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:19 AM
> >> > Subject: Re: Thoughts on OWB 1.1.7 ?
> >>
> >
> >> > AFAIK some fix in trunk were not ported to 1.1.7 branch. Before
> >> releasing, we
> >> > must fix these bugs.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ________________________________
> >> > Kimden: David Blevins <david.blevins@gmail.com>
> >> > Kime: openwebbeans-dev <dev@openwebbeans.apache.org>
> >> > G=F6nderildi=F0i Tarih: 27 Kas=FDm 2012 0:52 Sal=FD
> >> > Konu: Thoughts on OWB 1.1.7 ?
> >> >
> >> > What's the approximate timeline on 1.1.7 ?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > -David
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

--e0cb4efe33808653be04cf795d8f--