openwebbeans-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: heavy cleanup
Date Sun, 25 Nov 2012 22:07:17 GMT
Hi,

does the lifting prepare the CDI 1.1?
Or do we also want CDI 1.1 developments in?

I mean, does CDI 1.1 require a 1.2, 1.5 or 2.0?

Not sure it needs a 2.0, but maybe a real jump in versions would be great.
Thoughts?


2012/11/25 Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>

> good idea, I'll go update trunk.
>
> Please note that this does _not_ change anything for the 1.1.x branch!
>
> I'll do all this heavy lifting purely in trunk (1.2.x)
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 8:52 PM
> > Subject: Re: heavy cleanup
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Will we also target java 1.6 ?
> >
> > 2012/11/25 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> >
> >>  +1
> >>
> >>  All can be done independently now normally
> >>  Le 25 nov. 2012 20:37, "Mark Struberg" <struberg@yahoo.de>
> > a écrit :
> >>
> >>  > I again found a heavy bug which is caused by things like
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >     //X TODO this MUST NOT be public!
> >>  >     public static
> > ThreadLocal<List<DependentCreationalContext<Object>>>
> >>  > dependentInstanceOfProducerMethods =
> >>  >         new
> > ThreadLocal<List<DependentCreationalContext<Object>>>();
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  > Such code is pure PITA!
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  > I'm really tempted to do a heavy cleanup in 1.2.0 (trunk) and go
> > for
> >>  > CDI-1.1 directly. The spec is good enough to give a rough direction
> > atm
> >>  and
> >>  > we really need to cleanup tons of things!
> >>  >
> >>  > LieGrue,
> >>  > strub
> >>  >
> >>
> >
>



-- 
Jean-Louis

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message