openwebbeans-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: heavy cleanup
Date Sun, 25 Nov 2012 22:49:12 GMT
Should a 1.1 but we already have it so 1.2 is very good
Le 25 nov. 2012 23:38, "Mark Struberg" <struberg@yahoo.de> a écrit :

> CDI-1.1 is only a bugfix release of the spec. Mostly clarifications ad
> minor improvements.
> So I think 1.2.x will do fine.
>
>
>
> The reason is that I personally dont have time to do 3 branches. So keep
> SPI compat and CDI-1.0 in 1.1.x and do CDI-1.1 in owb-1.2.x.
> CDI-1.1 is really just around the corner. And we would loose lots of
> momentum if we do an intermediate step.
> Also most of the stuff like HierarchicBeanManager will only get clarified
> in CDI-1.1.
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> >________________________________
> > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeanouii@gmail.com>
> >To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org; Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> >Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 11:07 PM
> >Subject: Re: heavy cleanup
> >
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >
> >does the lifting prepare the CDI 1.1?
> >Or do we also want CDI 1.1 developments in?
> >
> >
> >I mean, does CDI 1.1 require a 1.2, 1.5 or 2.0?
> >
> >
> >Not sure it needs a 2.0, but maybe a real jump in versions would be great.
> >Thoughts?
> >
> >
> >
> >2012/11/25 Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> >
> >good idea, I'll go update trunk.
> >>
> >>Please note that this does _not_ change anything for the 1.1.x branch!
> >>
> >>I'll do all this heavy lifting purely in trunk (1.2.x)
> >>
> >>LieGrue,
> >>strub
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>
> >>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >>> Cc:
> >>> Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 8:52 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: heavy cleanup
> >>>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> Will we also target java 1.6 ?
> >>>
> >>> 2012/11/25 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>>>  +1
> >>>>
> >>>>  All can be done independently now normally
> >>>>  Le 25 nov. 2012 20:37, "Mark Struberg" <struberg@yahoo.de>
> >>> a écrit :
> >>>>
> >>>>  > I again found a heavy bug which is caused by things like
> >>>>  >
> >>>>  >
> >>>>  >     //X TODO this MUST NOT be public!
> >>>>  >     public static
> >>> ThreadLocal<List<DependentCreationalContext<Object>>>
> >>>>  > dependentInstanceOfProducerMethods =
> >>>>  >         new
> >>> ThreadLocal<List<DependentCreationalContext<Object>>>();
> >>>>  >
> >>>>  >
> >>>>  > Such code is pure PITA!
> >>>>  >
> >>>>  >
> >>>>  > I'm really tempted to do a heavy cleanup in 1.2.0 (trunk) and
go
> >>> for
> >>>>  > CDI-1.1 directly. The spec is good enough to give a rough direction
> >>> atm
> >>>>  and
> >>>>  > we really need to cleanup tons of things!
> >>>>  >
> >>>>  > LieGrue,
> >>>>  > strub
> >>>>  >
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Jean-Louis
> >
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message