openwebbeans-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Thoughts on OWB 1.1.7 ?
Date Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:28:33 GMT
OK, I will merge these commits to 1.1.x branch from trunk. Then, no need to release 1.2.0

Thanks

Gurkan



________________________________
 Kimden: Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com>
Kime: "dev@openwebbeans.apache.org" <dev@openwebbeans.apache.org> 
Kopya: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de> 
Gönderildiği Tarih: 27 Kasım 2012 14:25 Salı
Konu: Re: Thoughts on OWB 1.1.7 ?
 
r1409751, r1409721 not ported to 1.1.x branch.  Mark, are you able to port this?



________________________________
Kimden: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
Kime: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org; Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com> 
Kopya: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de> 
Gönderildiği Tarih: 27 Kasım 2012 14:18 Salı
Konu: Re: Thoughts on OWB 1.1.7 ?

think only 1409721 was not ported, no?

*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*




2012/11/27 Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com>

> Hi Mark
>
> Yeah I get your point! I do not mean that we have to port module changes
> to 1.1.x branch. I just want to have other fixes that I mentioned in
> previous email in 1.1.x branch. If we will not commit these fix to branch,
> these fixes had already been committed to the 1.2.0 TRUNK, we can release
> 1.2.0.M1 before changing lots of the things in TRUNK.  For Siwpas, these
> fixes are very important.
>
>
> Gurkan
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>  Kimden: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> Kime: "dev@openwebbeans.apache.org" <dev@openwebbeans.apache.org>
> Gönderildiği Tarih: 27 Kasım 2012 13:51 Salı
> Konu: Re: Thoughts on OWB 1.1.7 ?
>
> Hi Gurkan!
>
> I think we should _not_ port back all changes we did on trunk. That would
> make the maintenance branch worthless.
> I would e.g. not port back the SPI and module changes because that means
> it's not a drop-in replacement anymore. I have not looked at the
> webbeans-cluster stuff right now. If this is not needed for most users
> which do not use fail-over then I can imagine that it might be ok for 1.1.7
> as well. It should at least be drop in for most of our users.
>
>
> Before heading to release 1.2.0 I would like to fix our Security stuff
> with commons-privilizer.
>
>
> There are for sure a few things we need to fix in both branches. E.g.
> making the Producers stateless and remove the CreationalContext from them.
>
>
> How do we handle this in JIRA?
> I propose to create a bug report for 1.2.0 and then create a clone for
> 1.1.7 just for tracking commits and to be able to get a clean release
> report. wdyt?
>
> Please tell us your preferences for doing a 1.2.0 release.
> So far we are still on CDI-1.0, releasing 1.2.0 with CDI-1.0 and later
> moving to 1.1 sounds a bit weird imo.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com>
> > To: "dev@openwebbeans.apache.org" <dev@openwebbeans.apache.org>
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:19 AM
> > Subject: Re: Thoughts on OWB 1.1.7 ?
> >
> > AFAIK some fix in trunk were not ported to 1.1.7 branch. Before
> releasing, we
> > must fix these bugs.
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > Kimden: David Blevins <david.blevins@gmail.com>
> > Kime: openwebbeans-dev <dev@openwebbeans.apache.org>
> > Gönderildiği Tarih: 27 Kasım 2012 0:52 Salı
> > Konu: Thoughts on OWB 1.1.7 ?
> >
> > What's the approximate timeline on 1.1.7 ?
> >
> >
> > -David
> >
>
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message