Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91B2F108C7 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 06:00:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33858 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2014 06:00:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-users-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 33684 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2014 06:00:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 33673 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2014 06:00:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 06:00:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [65.20.0.132] (HELO smtpout12.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk) (65.20.0.132) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 06:00:18 +0000 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A090204.539A935A.0142,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=8/97,refid=2.7.2:2014.6.12.170620:17:8.317,ip=,rules=__HAS_MSGID, __MSGID_COMMENT, __HAS_X_MAILER, X_MAILER_EUDORA_7109, __ANY_QUALCOMM_MUA, __EUDORA_MUA, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __HAS_FROM, __PHISH_FROM2, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL_FROM, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __IN_REP_TO, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, MIME_LOWER_CASE, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __FORWARDED_MSG, BODY_SIZE_1700_1799, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, __PHISH_FROM, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, FORGED_MUA_EUDORA, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS, NO_URI_FOUND X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Received: from D9X6FX0J.btinternet.com (86.180.125.98) by smtpout12.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (8.6.100.99.10223) (authenticated as b.m.barker) id 53998A780009A8B4 for users@openoffice.apache.org; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 06:59:54 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1402639215; bh=KzwWAnZS6ELDWlkVvDiJdi1YmhCyfHD+w1/dvNp1ghU=; h=Message-ID:X-Mailer:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=TOiG+u6/+CCHTNPrm2/qzmvDGpNoVBBunZap+JeWsB7ZQx5ygEbEILd8bjMyibU5B7FC6yZnVda9sBjiarmmrx2CPdLsQdUa3ZSf5y7oLrLIl2oeYBT3fVe82U3SSUmYW1nRfqdY6nX+X8n8too53UytxCQJXmtx3LZlVoZhuc0= Message-ID: <53998A780009A8B4@smtpout12.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk> (added by postmaster@btinternet.com) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 06:59:50 +0100 To: users@openoffice.apache.org From: Brian Barker Subject: Re: How to prevent very long text in a cell overlap the footer in Calc? In-Reply-To: References: <539886e3.e8bf440a.0a6d.7643SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 140612-0, 12/06/2014), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org At 15:39 11/06/2014 -1000, Rochelle Noname wrote: >If this forum is to be a meaningful source of shared knowledge, no >matter what skill level or ability the poster has, there must be >respect and decorum. If a poster has a question to ask, there may >be many others seeking the same or similar solution. If you can't >contribute to the body of knowledge, then don't reply at all. >Allowing such remarks is off putting to others, enough to prevent >someone from future contributions or asking of help. What you say is, of course, entirely true. But I suggest it's misplaced. Mr Groenescheij can speak for himself - indeed, he already has - but are you right to castigate him for writing either "You can't fill a 10 liter bucket with 11 liter water" or "what you try to do is driving a screw in the wall with a hammer"? These expression are surely perfectly sensible metaphors meaning respectively "You are attempting the impossible" and "You are using the wrong tool for the task", both respectable opinions - and notably directed at the questioner's technique, not personally at the questioner himself. If someone is making his own life difficult by using an inappropriate tool for a task, there is no disrespect in pointing this out. Indeed, it is a kindness and a courtesy to do so. Questioners should appreciate that no disrespect is meant and consider the possibility that they might go about their task another way. (It remains their choice, of course.) You mention that others may be seeking a solution to a similar problem; they too, of course, may equally be helped by such advice. But you are completely right about the need for "respect and decorum". Brian Barker --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@openoffice.apache.org