Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CAFAA10ECE for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 01:46:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92422 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2013 01:46:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-users-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 92388 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2013 01:46:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 92380 invoked by uid 99); 10 Nov 2013 01:46:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 01:46:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of peter.junge@gmx.org designates 212.227.15.19 as permitted sender) Received: from [212.227.15.19] (HELO mout.gmx.net) (212.227.15.19) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 01:46:17 +0000 Received: from [65.19.142.253] ([65.19.142.253]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lkx9B-1WDYO11NDB-00akz4 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 02:45:57 +0100 Message-ID: <527EE551.6070002@gmx.org> Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 09:45:53 +0800 From: Peter Junge User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Shall we waste twelve more years promoting Free office suites instead of... References: <20131109175647.GG2160@nexaima.net> In-Reply-To: <20131109175647.GG2160@nexaima.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:YuBs97D+6rdZwPR6b9dpUw2m996Qk+6No6RSlXwqp8Q2W2PysAz dwYXJO3H38o1xkhB7isae8lq1HOD29MfbQwg1h8AhOhpdIhGsxc1Rq0Obh55MikwTP5VxSo KVCmUGobmoWuYDKdfbeuwtQBH7vIh3mX7zUumw4Llwk/129Pqt+M+z0nZWO/lkqNkhHdkcU 6FwEP5yk9jd4H+d9P6hJQ== X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 11/10/2013 01:56 AM, M. Fioretti wrote: > Twelve (TWELVE!!!) years ago I asked OpenOffice users “Are you > advocating OO correctly”. Six years ago I said the same things in a > different format. A couple of weeks ago, I came across a perfect proof > that that kind of advocay IS right, but so far has been never > practiced enough. > > Continues on my blog: > > http://stop.zona-m.net/2013/11/shall-we-waste-twelve-more-years-promoting-free-office-suites-instead-of-open-office-formats/ Prominently within that article is an advertisement (from Google add services) to download OO from usDOTcom which we know is a fraud. :-( > > Feedback very welcome, of course! > > Marco > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@openoffice.apache.org