Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D11BA10DFC for ; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 00:04:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76365 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2013 00:04:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-users-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 76233 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2013 00:04:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for users@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 28610 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jul 2013 21:39:06 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rgaloppini@slashdotmedia.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=slashdotmedia.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=7eo0ZY07+sIq0RKmobswyZq29FiNOoM3H1dSGe2c7Ng=; b=KWJ6nw8d5MXns+75fVST+g6tYAMCgPX8D4AL519lkcl+qy1sAheiwy6/F0Aj8fx8nc s1mfnDd+aLZim7gqy1MG2285VuKggsw6xTYhLeiK/Gy7l/NZe/KCfRtMz/O6/oplObGp hdKmNp7+6BiccONnSyNSYxkMdzenj91ZY704o= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=7eo0ZY07+sIq0RKmobswyZq29FiNOoM3H1dSGe2c7Ng=; b=D7yFD40VlG7UW+1BNZfVGUaBUeTbYvCgPA6Ye6/x/s+VvC7Ou0ddqhHiEzHrF2cE+r HswRxhqSqmd6vXEy0ckc9du3EZJYbSHY/SyDrJkD1Q6Y2HYw3mfYKJYSzI6QAfho6jpC oBI4zanNnFcH6Oj7Yy26t9a+1kkSMcEJ+FFIJtZH/9TZ4i9SlonjT2lSNNKA3jrxTDok uMb/VhpfrkfCQVy2R2dYr/S4BmKBaI5t5QwCOsJeDcvtyu5Qcn9oMQjzi63iW8t70Ip/ Nz0I9wJ1sUHrtX/NJHgdSiUyvqglY3wO028ByyZ1CLLLplHkhdLF46Unc/WkbBfB251g MYdQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.183.104 with SMTP id el8mr3499918wic.43.1374788321258; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:38:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 23:38:41 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FUD right after download From: Roberto Galoppini To: users@openoffice.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkc4zoMOA70u2PDrhQkx/BD5hYmBjxNLxa9b72kvH9mal68iJ3sd5QHB5lLtYWWdTYFY/mX X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > Oh sweet irony, right after downloading AOO 4.0, and before one even > gets a chance to install it, you get the same FUD review from a LO > zealot as part of the SF.Net redirect to the reviews section... > http://img580.imageshack.us/img580/1351/3ni.png > > (those are SourceForge.net's user-submitted reviews, which shows the > highest scoring review "vs" the lowest scoring one). > > Strangely, it doesn't matter if you select "most helpful" or "sorted > by date" afterwards from the drop down at the bottom of that page, the > displayed reviews do not change, it's always the same 5-star, one-line > review that says "a great alternative" vs the 1-star review full of > AOO FUD from someone who says "use LO instead". Thanks for heads up Fernando, this has been fixed now. See https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/reviews/ Roberto > > I feel tempted to write a one-star review that reads "I'm a > LibreOffice troll and I hate to see AOO 4.0 released!" and see if it > gets displayed :-P. > > FC > -- > During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act > - George Orwell --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@openoffice.apache.org