Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70FE710754 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 07:28:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46765 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2013 07:28:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-users-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 46738 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2013 07:28:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for users@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 15136 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2013 07:05:52 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy) Message-ID: <51EF7CAB.7040302@icon.co.za> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:05:15 +0200 From: Andrew Brown Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?ACE=B2_Services?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Virgil Arrington CC: users@openoffice.apache.org, users@global.libreoffice.org Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Conflicts? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Virgil If I may offer my input here as I have and still use both, with my clients mainly. Apache OOo has deprecated slightly, i.e. it has not caught up to LibreOffice. In the overall basic user features there is not much difference, but OOo stagnated, being firstly involved in the merger from Sun Microsystems to Oracle, who did not do much with OOo. This created the fork to LO and the development of LO continued. It was not until OOo was offered to Apache by Oracle, that it started to gain momentum again, but alas in my experience it is now playing catch-up with LO. One of the issues I have with my users using Apache OOo, is that they are able to open multiple single sessions of either Writer or Calc, and eventually their systems run out of resources and memory, generating a number of unnecessary service calls of complaints "my system is slow" etc. I have not experienced this with any clients using LO, and I am migrating my Apache OOo clients over to LO, due to this issue. So my opinion, off the bat, LO is the better choice. Regards Andrew Brown On 23/07/2013 09:38 PM, Virgil Arrington wrote: > Are there any known conflicts with having LO 4.0.4 and AOO 4.0 installed on the same computer? In my never-ending, obsessive (and admittedly futile) search for computing perfection, I want to try both programs to see which better meets my techno-needs. > > Virgil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@openoffice.apache.org