Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D685C41E for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:35:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29589 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2013 14:35:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-users-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 29511 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2013 14:35:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 29502 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2013 14:35:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:35:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [194.25.134.19] (HELO mailout06.t-online.de) (194.25.134.19) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:35:39 +0000 Received: from fwd12.aul.t-online.de (fwd12.aul.t-online.de ) by mailout06.t-online.de with smtp id 1Ur7rM-00038d-Pd; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:35:12 +0200 Received: from [192.168.0.23] (GMGZYrZYghrO6XJK4XNrudHgRr+thkKcPWKaYKG2GyynF+A2Mhu4KRTN7yICyZGwyp@[87.161.133.242]) by fwd12.t-online.de with esmtp id 1Ur7rB-1asSLA0; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:35:01 +0200 Message-ID: <51C85914.3030409@t-online.de> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:35:00 +0200 From: Regina Henschel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Codes References: <1371903858.66770.YahooMailClassic@web122501.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <20130622153511.f7fde57000da11ca7ccb5118@iol.ie> <51C5F0AA.6040408@optonline.net> In-Reply-To: <51C5F0AA.6040408@optonline.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ID: GMGZYrZYghrO6XJK4XNrudHgRr+thkKcPWKaYKG2GyynF+A2Mhu4KRTN7yICyZGwyp X-TOI-MSGID: 0a14da97-dafc-492d-a04e-b3bfeba787c4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, Doug schrieb: > On 06/22/2013 10:35 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > > /snip/ > >> >> If the WP lobby feel so strongly about not having "Reveal Codes", why don't they do something about it and write an extension to do just that? >> > > Maybe it's because we're not programmers. We're people who just want to > use a word processor without all the folderol of "styles." It may not > have occurred to some OO/LO folks that most of us do not want to change > styles or formats all the time. Or, maybe, ever. About the only > formats I ever change are typeface, type size, and justification. > Most of us are not writing advertizing copy, and we're not typesetters. > We have no reason to keep fooling with different "styles." > > Now if OO and LO are so great, why can't they deal with curly quotes and > apostrophes in imported text? They can. The text needs to have paragraph style "Default". Then use menu Format > AutoCorrect... > Apply. Of cause you need to enable the replacement of straight quotes in the AutoCorrect options. I have to go thru and fix all the > damned inch marks one by one by hand. WordPerfect can do that > automatically. Not only that, it can differentiate between quote marks > and real inch and foot designators. Let's see your OO/LO do that! It will exchange U+OO22 to that quote marks you select in the AutoCorrect options and the kind of replacement will depend on the language. If a 'real inch' and a 'foot designator' is different from sign U+0022, it will not be touched. > > If I remember correctly--I haven't looked at OO/LO in some time--they > don't let you find and replace double spaces. Maybe they fixed that? Simple find and replace works. I have not tested regular expressions. > > But I tend to work in Linux most often, so without WordPerfect, I have > chosen the SoftMaker products. TextMaker works better, IMO, than either > of the freebies, and it doesn't look so primitive, either. Oh, and > there's now a free version of that, I hear. They had an offer to download the previous version for free and had a special price offer for the new version at begin of this year. Kind regards Regina --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@openoffice.apache.org