Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-doc-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-doc-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A834F18223 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 08:04:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54465 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2015 08:04:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-doc-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 54431 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2015 08:04:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact doc-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: doc@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list doc@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 54418 invoked by uid 99); 9 Dec 2015 08:04:14 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 08:04:14 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id B499FC8C59 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 08:04:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.102 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.102 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GYI3Ojzw5BQA for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 08:04:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pf0-f180.google.com (mail-pf0-f180.google.com [209.85.192.180]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id C3B4E42B82 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 08:04:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pfnn128 with SMTP id n128so26209140pfn.0 for ; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 00:04:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=cd3+CNu/cAiYg4BKBUc/AvN9aR1BdELaXzf9t1SWMkg=; b=n93peXV1Ihqjh4JAqLBF+jTo4RfC88INPMXkAr4ezBYTl/r70vpYyJyRQ4GF8RyguS M/mTngAGu8wylTgROryfeMlnZ+wniGivTbh9Z0R8R4TshHVIWAYRvYjkx3KTR3/6eEyO oACMhG8YS8qA7i8DgPvOcwXltF6xeUFy5dEvRElyqKKkpHGqiwjA2b8E+Imh03KA7BKo lyHS9r1xqn/h2K+q2qaW50qS5JxWm/6U/etPTayztkWr2KIXUDY0DbeOCzfuxJbSacZp dy6fP0EhOR4G8SDeO3vlvMfFsJzU7k2t0SYgSrqr7s+ShGl5l1Wbin15Ejp7o1ebO5u8 e4Wg== X-Received: by 10.98.8.136 with SMTP id 8mr11202451pfi.16.1449648246133; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 00:04:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:601:4201:4936:186d:1921:4a7f:686e? ([2601:601:4201:4936:186d:1921:4a7f:686e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e25sm9429674pfb.64.2015.12.09.00.04.04 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 09 Dec 2015 00:04:05 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Can we get this started again? To: doc@openoffice.apache.org References: From: toki X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <5667E06A.3090000@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 08:03:54 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DqfF076tDepA4s7S8aH5EWFuMlDwmO3VV" --DqfF076tDepA4s7S8aH5EWFuMlDwmO3VV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/12/2015 03:09, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > There are ways to document the differences where they exist. This gets into what qualifies as a difference that is significant enough to mention: # How many people realize that: * different versions of Java behave differently. Doesn't matter if LibO, AOo, or EU are being used; * there are differences in LibO when using Windows, Mac OS X, Linux, and BSD; # User-installed extensions that alter built-in functionality, as a side-effect of what they are supposed to do; All that said, with the appropriate use of styles --- roughly 40 of them --- one can visually indicate which version of which program on which OS a specific note refers to. >If all you are suggesting is that we just en mass move to LO I am not as sanguine. In theory, ODFAuthors is program agnostic. jonathon --DqfF076tDepA4s7S8aH5EWFuMlDwmO3VV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWZ+BzAAoJEKG7hs8nSMR7sr8P/R062hotxp0fm9XqOHV+Zgd4 lLNCEcv41QjG8fzULfgd6UrGz92yPTTnjQ7ANEOtRWVUw3iX4sUKAOB1UBwMa0sA 659Z6vjOChM7kFPc/z03yyrNRztUDDCk3Md5m6pLrL5pRJbk5EG6gntyPmFVmAgT GrTyYtrkIheFyZTmISNaShkpoB7GrmAPOdcaSWgTnC93GoNBMBj39DfRUsmFrYm2 /maxJrCKqJ7zUbDH/uaGDiOUK6AVyyhid13oe5JRutftHi2WVOMuiShTLci2gtvF Fj54s80iBFcvXh15JVXqWiJx6ZDcZhEKorE1vOoNcBwduxM/BJ514Fm8shZVV1zC nKJKT7AZDhSwDEsX6CD9FqQDKcBYVTicasJtOQfzCahNDlGQt5SQebY9ODVMX8cF MEaKthX1wzUV9ADL8eyCytIMLHtruJG0NgKxfLHaPHOUIDyxk5CZ8VJPDp/CY7Gx si999qbo7hfM9vNFZahDIbgycGAxDKKJvYyBOyOaJ2Alqm8RbcSHlVRjTacW4ToF 0cW2PWOcSU7WrEpsnOS//bCBu6nR4rwwAtVHvhqNOsm9b11LvSnCD5spI09aDgfH aDB41mUksadX6Ydvrag8y3vk6RBXOw3u7OmxClkf5lCcVSv5p81/0O7/r1z8VInm 36aBBcLIiWUNOl9ezJFY =2c0k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DqfF076tDepA4s7S8aH5EWFuMlDwmO3VV--