Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-doc-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-doc-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 54FB1E9AD for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 23:17:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72306 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2013 23:17:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-doc-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 72263 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2013 23:17:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact doc-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: doc@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list doc@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 72255 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2013 23:17:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 23:17:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rgb.mldc@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.169] (HELO mail-ia0-f169.google.com) (209.85.210.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 23:17:37 +0000 Received: by mail-ia0-f169.google.com with SMTP id j5so2030531iaf.0 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 15:17:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2O50pirTxqaeIMOOa5tDJxzs0Vd+OKrz55CxcO36TzU=; b=GuKqpgqoj4raVnJ6sMs2jOnJ1ciiHyFSKcWYps5VuTRDpg/eFWIpF2xZIso8roXZx9 6zsvQc8RLUhaLdACsvWCPvxsSuph0E31II/2+IJiy8cXi2iCnOC/B5b2DuzyrNtZ/jWA MFgZBpQdP0Vq3f1r/asA3JnK8rE2ch8yaW8XrE5SEtgbVmKOVfyXXClCxgVaoJnA49i7 3sLWeL2aeVJbgplgqSFvKsgHl9ubu1WruSNk8Qgg6rcLERE2TL6SJ31Z7x+ZG5T3XxQc ppeXQKT8qvROqJi3CRafY9MGSOC+BG3RiX8elZbcDHc+XSnvm4m24qtXzex0GLvV6LsC hhuQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.33.139 with SMTP id r11mr2195553igi.63.1361747836558; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 15:17:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.231.6 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 15:17:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <512A6401.7070800@apache.org> References: <512A6401.7070800@apache.org> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:17:16 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Discuss]Call for volunteers [Was: Re: Starting to build the user guide] From: RGB ES To: doc@openoffice.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04462dd61268bd04d680a07f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d04462dd61268bd04d680a07f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2013/2/24 Andrea Pescetti > On 20/02/2013 RGB ES wrote: > >> 2013/2/19 Rob Weir >> >>> Maybe this already exists, and it already exists, but it might help to >>> have a series of page tags for things like: >>> 1) This page is being drafted by XXX and is not ready for review yet >>> 2) This page has been drafted and is ready for editing >>> 3) This page is currently being edited by XXX >>> 4) This page is done editing and is ready for technical review >>> 5) This page is being reviewed by XXX for technical contents >>> 6) This page is ready for final review/approval >>> 7) This page is approved for publication >>> Or is this overkill? ... >>> >> >> Maybe just a bit overkill... :) >> What about a "status page" on the wiki? >> > > I agree that a simple status page may be enough for the time being. Then > we are free to add more complexity as needed, and it's good that all > technology is already there. > I finally started a "status" page: http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/UserGuide/Status It lists all the existing pages and several of the needed ones. I know many users checked the pages I wrote (many thanks!) but I have not had the time to look at the history of the pages to acknowledge all of them on this status page, sorry. Any idea how to improve the readability of this status page? Regards Ricardo > > Regards, > Andrea. > --f46d04462dd61268bd04d680a07f--