Emilie Drd |
English flyer |
Tue, 01 Dec, 09:58 |
Pedro Lino |
Re: English flyer |
Tue, 01 Dec, 10:57 |
Emilie Drd |
RE: English flyer |
Tue, 01 Dec, 11:03 |
Peter Kovacs |
RE: English flyer |
Tue, 01 Dec, 13:24 |
Matthias Seidel |
Re: English flyer |
Tue, 01 Dec, 13:30 |
Jim Jagielski |
Fwd: [openoffice] branch AOO42X updated: Upgrade to APR(*) 1.6.x and work around Xcode12 over-agressive clang warning/errors |
Tue, 01 Dec, 15:40 |
Matthias Seidel |
Re: Fwd: [openoffice] branch AOO42X updated: Upgrade to APR(*) 1.6.x and work around Xcode12 over-agressive clang warning/errors |
Tue, 01 Dec, 16:05 |
Jim Jagielski |
Re: [openoffice] branch AOO42X updated: Upgrade to APR(*) 1.6.x and work around Xcode12 over-agressive clang warning/errors |
Tue, 01 Dec, 16:45 |
Mel Earley |
Question re Chromebook |
Tue, 01 Dec, 18:52 |
Peter Kovacs |
Re: Question re Chromebook |
Tue, 01 Dec, 20:11 |
Don Lewis |
Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Huge updates to macOS UNO bridges, based on FreeBSD and Linux. |
Tue, 01 Dec, 23:16 |
Jim Jagielski |
Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Huge updates to macOS UNO bridges, based on FreeBSD and Linux. |
Wed, 02 Dec, 03:30 |
Jim Jagielski |
Help w/ bt |
Wed, 02 Dec, 13:34 |
Damjan Jovanovic |
Re: Help w/ bt |
Wed, 02 Dec, 15:25 |
Marcus |
Re: [openoffice-org] branch main updated: Updated download numbers for November |
Wed, 02 Dec, 18:54 |
Matthias Seidel |
Re: [openoffice-org] branch main updated: Updated download numbers for November |
Wed, 02 Dec, 19:01 |
Dave Fisher |
Re: [openoffice-org] branch main updated: Updated download numbers for November |
Wed, 02 Dec, 19:02 |
Marcus |
Re: [openoffice-org] branch main updated: Updated download numbers for November |
Wed, 02 Dec, 19:07 |
Marcus |
Re: [openoffice-org] branch main updated: Updated download numbers for November |
Wed, 02 Dec, 19:07 |
Marcus |
Re: [openoffice-org] branch main updated: Updated download numbers for November |
Wed, 02 Dec, 19:12 |
Dave Fisher |
Re: [openoffice-org] branch main updated: Updated download numbers for November |
Wed, 02 Dec, 19:16 |
Jim Jagielski |
Re: Help w/ bt |
Wed, 02 Dec, 19:30 |
Matthias Seidel |
Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Huge updates to macOS UNO bridges, based on FreeBSD and Linux. |
Wed, 02 Dec, 20:50 |
Don Lewis |
Re: Help w/ bt |
Wed, 02 Dec, 21:47 |
Damjan Jovanovic |
Re: Help w/ bt |
Thu, 03 Dec, 02:02 |
Jim Jagielski |
macOS - oldest supported version |
Thu, 03 Dec, 02:42 |
Matthias Seidel |
Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Huge updates to macOS UNO bridges, based on FreeBSD and Linux. |
Thu, 03 Dec, 09:33 |
Peter Kovacs |
Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Huge updates to macOS UNO bridges, based on FreeBSD and Linux. |
Thu, 03 Dec, 10:56 |
Dave Fisher |
Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Use of strcpy is problematic esp when we don't check bounds. Ugg. Instead use memmove(); Increase buffer sizes due to larger requirements. |
Thu, 03 Dec, 15:34 |
Jim Jagielski |
Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Use of strcpy is problematic esp when we don't check bounds. Ugg. Instead use memmove(); Increase buffer sizes due to larger requirements. |
Thu, 03 Dec, 16:56 |
Jim Jagielski |
Re: Help w/ bt |
Thu, 03 Dec, 17:08 |
Jim Jagielski |
Re: Help w/ bt |
Thu, 03 Dec, 17:49 |
Damjan Jovanovic |
Re: Help w/ bt |
Thu, 03 Dec, 17:54 |
Dave Fisher |
Re: macOS - oldest supported version |
Thu, 03 Dec, 18:38 |
Peter Kovacs |
Re: Help w/ bt |
Fri, 04 Dec, 07:26 |
Peter Kovacs |
Re: macOS - oldest supported version |
Fri, 04 Dec, 08:19 |
Tony |
Loss of OpenOffice |
Fri, 04 Dec, 16:43 |
Rory O'Farrell |
Re: Loss of OpenOffice |
Fri, 04 Dec, 16:53 |
Moderator |
Re: Loss of OpenOffice |
Fri, 04 Dec, 17:01 |
Marcus |
Re: macOS - oldest supported version |
Fri, 04 Dec, 17:30 |
Jan Alanco |
Tämä estää asennuksen |
Sat, 05 Dec, 08:33 |
Marcus |
Re: Tämä estää asennuksen |
Sat, 05 Dec, 09:58 |
Eliodoro MIRANDA |
Request of support for open office calc |
Sat, 05 Dec, 19:03 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] [openoffice] NordMike opened a new pull request #110: Issue #128416 - Fixing failure due to moving absent file |
Sat, 05 Dec, 19:40 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] [openoffice] Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #110: Issue #128416 - Fixing failure due to moving absent file |
Sat, 05 Dec, 19:55 |
Jim Jagielski |
Java 1.6 |
Sat, 05 Dec, 20:20 |
Matthias Seidel |
Re: Java 1.6 |
Sat, 05 Dec, 20:33 |
Mechtilde |
Re: Java 1.6 |
Sat, 05 Dec, 21:04 |
Larry Gusaas |
Re: Java 1.6 |
Sat, 05 Dec, 23:05 |
F Campos Costero |
Re: Request of support for open office calc |
Sun, 06 Dec, 05:55 |
Dick Groskamp |
Re: Request of support for open office calc |
Sun, 06 Dec, 11:36 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] [openoffice] NordMike commented on pull request #110: Issue #128416 - Fixing failure due to moving absent file |
Sun, 06 Dec, 12:07 |
Bidouille |
Re: Request of support for open office calc |
Sun, 06 Dec, 12:25 |
Mechtilde |
Review of PR 109 |
Sun, 06 Dec, 12:57 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] [openoffice] Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #110: Issue #128416 - Fixing failure due to moving absent file |
Sun, 06 Dec, 13:54 |
Arrigo Marchiori |
Re: Review of PR 109 |
Sun, 06 Dec, 13:59 |
Mechtilde |
Re: Review of PR 109 |
Sun, 06 Dec, 14:11 |
Matthias Seidel |
Re: Review of PR 109 |
Sun, 06 Dec, 14:25 |
Mechtilde |
Re: Review of PR 109 |
Sun, 06 Dec, 14:43 |
Matthias Seidel |
Re: Review of PR 109 |
Sun, 06 Dec, 14:44 |
Jim Jagielski |
Re: Java 1.6 |
Sun, 06 Dec, 15:15 |
Matthias Seidel |
Re: Java 1.6 |
Sun, 06 Dec, 15:19 |
Matthias Seidel |
Re: Java 1.6 |
Sun, 06 Dec, 19:39 |
Mechtilde |
Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109) |
Mon, 07 Dec, 06:48 |
Peter Kovacs |
Configure missing gtk-plugin |
Mon, 07 Dec, 06:51 |
Peter Kovacs |
Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109) |
Mon, 07 Dec, 06:57 |
Don Lewis |
Re: Configure missing gtk-plugin |
Mon, 07 Dec, 07:04 |
Peter Kovacs |
Re: Configure missing gtk-plugin |
Mon, 07 Dec, 07:24 |
Arrigo Marchiori |
Re: How to cope with Python module putting .so files into lib64 instead of lib? |
Mon, 07 Dec, 07:30 |
Peter Kovacs |
Re: How to cope with Python module putting .so files into lib64 instead of lib? |
Mon, 07 Dec, 07:43 |
Jim Jagielski |
Re: Java 1.6 |
Mon, 07 Dec, 13:46 |
Peter Kovacs |
Re: Configure missing gtk-plugin |
Mon, 07 Dec, 16:04 |
Mechtilde |
Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109) |
Mon, 07 Dec, 18:00 |
Peter Kovacs |
Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109) |
Mon, 07 Dec, 18:16 |
Mechtilde |
Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109) |
Mon, 07 Dec, 18:26 |
Peter Kovacs |
[discussion] future embedded DB in AOO |
Mon, 07 Dec, 18:38 |
Mechtilde |
Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO |
Mon, 07 Dec, 19:10 |
Jim Jagielski |
Beanshell (Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109)) |
Mon, 07 Dec, 19:35 |
Jörg Schmidt |
RE: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO |
Mon, 07 Dec, 19:46 |
Jim Jagielski |
Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO |
Mon, 07 Dec, 19:48 |
Jörg Schmidt |
RE: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO |
Mon, 07 Dec, 19:52 |
Mechtilde |
[discussion] future embedded DB in AOO |
Mon, 07 Dec, 20:51 |
Mechtilde |
Re: Beanshell (Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109)) |
Mon, 07 Dec, 20:56 |
Jim Jagielski |
Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO |
Mon, 07 Dec, 21:11 |
Jim Jagielski |
Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO |
Mon, 07 Dec, 21:19 |
Peter Kovacs |
Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO |
Mon, 07 Dec, 21:27 |
Jörg Schmidt |
RE: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO |
Mon, 07 Dec, 21:35 |
Peter Kovacs |
Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO |
Mon, 07 Dec, 22:02 |
Jim Jagielski |
Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO |
Mon, 07 Dec, 22:03 |
Peter Kovacs |
Re: Beanshell (Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109)) |
Mon, 07 Dec, 22:07 |
Peter Kovacs |
Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO |
Mon, 07 Dec, 22:09 |
Dave Fisher |
Re: Beanshell (Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109)) |
Mon, 07 Dec, 22:34 |
Peter Kovacs |
Re: Beanshell (Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109)) |
Tue, 08 Dec, 00:51 |
Peter Kovacs |
Re: Beanshell (Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109)) |
Tue, 08 Dec, 01:06 |
Damjan Jovanovic |
Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO |
Tue, 08 Dec, 02:06 |
Keith N. McKenna |
Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO |
Tue, 08 Dec, 02:48 |
Jörg Schmidt |
RE: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO |
Tue, 08 Dec, 08:14 |
Jörg Schmidt |
RE: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO |
Tue, 08 Dec, 08:27 |
Jörg Schmidt |
RE: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO |
Tue, 08 Dec, 08:27 |
Peter Kovacs |
Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO |
Tue, 08 Dec, 08:46 |