openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Date Tue, 06 Oct 2020 13:03:54 GMT
OK... as expected, it fails on macOS.

2 things I see: in the nss.patch file there is a line:

    Only in misc/build/nss-3.39/nss/coreconf: Darwin.mk.rej

So I'm wondering if the patch file itself or maybe even the whole pull request is borked.

Also, we need to force 'g++' on the macOS build to include '-std=c++11'

> On Oct 6, 2020, at 8:30 AM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com> wrote:
> 
> I am booting up the macOS VM for the 4.1.8-dev builds as we speak. Will update to head
and pull in nss
> 
>> On Oct 5, 2020, at 4:00 PM, Don Lewis <truckman@apache.org <mailto:truckman@apache.org>>
wrote:
>> 
>> Any progress on nss?
>> 
>> On 30 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> I'll see how the build on macOS goes, but likely won't be able to get to it until
Monday.
>>> 
>>>> On Sep 29, 2020, at 2:52 PM, Don Lewis <truckman@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>> Hi Don,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Am 26.09.20 um 23:47 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>>>>> On 26 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Am 25.09.20 um 18:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>>> Am 25.09.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>>>> That looks quite a bit more straightforward :-)
>>>>>>>> Let's wait for Don's PR, this is only a minor update from
Python 2.7.17
>>>>>>>> to 2.7.18.
>>>>>>> Merged now...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Unless Don wants to add something for the Java detection I would
think
>>>>>>> we are pretty close to a release candidate?
>>>>>> I've got another nss upgrade in the works as well as a small serf
bug
>>>>>> fix.
>>>>> 
>>>>> OK, if that can be done quick *and* safe?
>>>> 
>>>> nss is somewhat risky.  We've had problems with upgrading it in the
>>>> past, primarily with MacOS.  It does fix a fairly important CVE, though
>>>> I don't know if it potentially affects our usage of nss.  I just
>>>> submitted a pull request.
>>>> 
>>>> Serf should be fairly quick.  It's just a couple of patches
>>>> cherry-picked from upstream to fix a CVE.
>>>> 
>>>> There are also a few new libxml2 CVEs, but not a new release of the
>>>> library.  They can be fixed with some upstream cherry picks.
>>>> 
>>>>> Otherwise I doubt that we have a release in the next 2 weeks... ;-)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>>  Matthias
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org>
<mailto:dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org>>
<mailto:dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org>
<mailto:dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org>>>
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@openoffice.apache.org>
<mailto:dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@openoffice.apache.org>>
<mailto:dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@openoffice.apache.org><mailto:dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
<mailto:dev-help@openoffice.apache.org>>>
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org>
<mailto:dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org>>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@openoffice.apache.org>
<mailto:dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@openoffice.apache.org>>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message