Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9202E200D4D for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2017 18:49:03 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 90679160C0B; Sun, 3 Dec 2017 17:49:03 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 080D2160BF8 for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2017 18:49:02 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 79677 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2017 17:49:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 79661 invoked by uid 99); 3 Dec 2017 17:49:02 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Dec 2017 17:49:02 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.34] (unknown [151.67.52.62]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id ED5871A0044; Sun, 3 Dec 2017 17:49:00 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5A243908.1080407@apache.org> Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2017 18:48:56 +0100 From: Andrea Pescetti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: A more sane way to build - SCons, deCygwination and other hopes References: <8CD3D819-49A9-4B5A-8EF5-B4CD10304755@jaguNET.com> In-Reply-To: <8CD3D819-49A9-4B5A-8EF5-B4CD10304755@jaguNET.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Sun, 03 Dec 2017 17:49:03 -0000 On 02/12/2017 Jim Jagielski wrote: > What I don't want is some hybrid monstrosity like we > have now. Nor do I want work on the build system to hold > off release of 4.2.0. This is surely a good point. Actually, the wide delay between 4.1.0 and the future 4.2.0 is due in big part to build changes. Most welcome, but also time consuming. There is a reason, though, that makes Damjan's current effort worth investigating in all cases: we had to put a large patch (for a bugfix involving work with remote files) on hold for 4.1.2 since that would have required updating serf, which in turn would have implied that we added support for SCons as they have switched to it for their recent releases. I can dig up the issue if you need, just ask if interested. Having a way to build SCons-based packages would already be a step forward. And yes, it would be "just another tool" in this case, but with so many dependencies we must be able to integrate many build systems. Regards, Andrea. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org