Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5281200C25 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:58:31 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id A39AB160B69; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 08:58:31 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id EE565160B5C for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:58:30 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 59016 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2017 08:58:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 59005 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2017 08:58:29 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 08:58:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 774F318E5ED for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 08:58:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IDMlmThvahhy for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 08:58:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ngcobalt39.manitu.net (ngcobalt39.manitu.net [217.11.48.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 2C4825F56F for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 08:58:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Esprimo7935 (tmo-119-40.customers.d1-online.com [80.187.119.40]) (Authenticated sender: xjs01) by ngcobalt39.manitu.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87E622626435 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:48:09 +0100 (CET) From: =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Schmidt?= To: References: <7c00d1f0-8368-845e-7524-0a9fc7c656a2@Groenescheij.COM> <9959a6e8-2821-76dc-100e-60307560c9a8@gmx.net> <606c384f-2ca7-ab10-63c8-59e21c68ae1b@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <606c384f-2ca7-ab10-63c8-59e21c68ae1b@gmail.com> Subject: Re: trying to get a template from the page... Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:58:30 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609 Thread-Index: AdKOdaLArn5tB2QxQ3mohbAoZT3dtgABeJAw archived-at: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 08:58:31 -0000 > From: toki [mailto:toki.kantoor@gmail.com]=20 > >> Please go to > >> http://templates.services.openoffice.org/ > >> and say, which templates you can download. > >=20 > > This is meant as a joke?=20 >=20 > Regardless, what would be useful, would be a review of each of those > templates. No, because it is unrealistic to want to control 15,000 templates.=20 Similarly, I do not think it is a normal way, because the originals = should be checked and kept up-to-date by their authors. The discussion also points in the wrong direction, because there are = _technical_ problems with the templates website. These problems must be = eliminated and not the templates themselves should be checked. (OK, even the templates themselves have to be checked, but this is a = permanent process and this should be done by the authors of the = templates.) J=C3=B6rg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org