Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1053200BA3 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 05:10:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id BFA5B160AEA; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 03:10:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 07339160ADE for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 05:10:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 89173 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2016 03:10:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 89158 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2016 03:10:52 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 03:10:52 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 11EE2C0D64 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 03:10:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.971 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.971 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nxpiXckzT84I for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 03:10:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from biz190.inmotionhosting.com (biz190.inmotionhosting.com [216.194.168.105]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 6F3205F231 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 03:10:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ip70-181-175-67.sd.sd.cox.net ([70.181.175.67]:58144 helo=[192.168.1.129]) by biz190.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1brz50-0049Vd-Hc for dev@openoffice.apache.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 20:10:48 -0700 Subject: Re: {Dicuss] [Vote] To: dev@openoffice.apache.org References: <8c372e9d-bf1b-3817-2956-c4a5f67299f9__21129.0101673969$1475706528$gmane$org@acm.org> <20161005234933.GH12034__30157.8831546523$1475711403$gmane$org@localhost.localdomain> From: Patricia Shanahan Message-ID: <710ecab5-3099-141c-9989-fb703d94da5f@acm.org> Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 20:10:40 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz190.inmotionhosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - openoffice.apache.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - acm.org X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz190.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: pats+patriciashanahan.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed X-Authenticated-Sender: biz190.inmotionhosting.com: pats@patriciashanahan.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: archived-at: Thu, 06 Oct 2016 03:10:54 -0000 On 10/5/2016 5:51 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 07:17:27PM -0400, Keith N. McKenna wrote: >>> Patricia Shanahan wrote: >>>> I believe, based on my tracking and testing, that the release blockers >>>> are all fixed. I was hoping the people working on the bugs, especially >>>> those who requested release_blocker, will update them ASAP. >>>> >>> I have no doubt that they have been fixed, but they need to be updated >>> as we link to a query for them from the Release Notes and what message >>> does it give to the world if the Release Notes show Release Blockers as >>> still open? >> >> Most of these bugs don't make any sense in the release notes, they are >> too aoo-build specific. >> >> >> Regards >> > Ariel; > > In all the builds that I have been involved in with AOO we have included > a link to a Bugzilla query for all bugs fixed by that release.My concern > was 2 fold. One that it would give a wrong impression to anyone that > followed the link and the second was to try to keep Bugzilla up to date. > > If it is possible we should construct a query that excludes anything in > Product = Build Tools for the Release Notes. I think calling out the important stuff directly in the release notes but providing a Bugzilla link that shows everything, including tools, is a reasonable compromise. However, I am very open to suggestions for improving the release notes. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org