Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753C4200B3E for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 22:16:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 74094160AC1; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 20:16:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id BC8FA160ABF for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 22:16:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 88932 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2016 20:16:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 88921 invoked by uid 99); 7 Sep 2016 20:16:03 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Sep 2016 20:16:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 266A4C08D7 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 20:16:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.825 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.825 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.124, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fG4hbcgfJmVE for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 20:16:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-smtp-ng-out-1b.wtnet.de (mail-smtp-ng-out-1.wtnet.de [84.46.103.117]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id DCC6F5FAFA for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 20:16:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bc1-blade2.wtnet.de (mail-cust-ng-in-3.wtnet.de [84.46.103.103] (may be forged)) by bc1-blade6.wtnet.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u87KFrVF031835 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 22:15:53 +0200 X-WT-Originating-IP: 46.59.230.121 X-WT-Authenticated-As: marcus.mail Received: from f9.linux (CM-POP8-631.catv.wtnet.de [46.59.230.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by bc1-blade2.wtnet.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u87KFrQ7028523 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 22:15:53 +0200 Message-ID: <57D07578.50706@wtnet.de> Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 22:15:52 +0200 From: Marcus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: ooo-site "Participation/Help-Wanted" structure (was RE: What would OpenOffice NON-retirement involve?) References: <006301d206fe$8c381070$a4a83150$@acm.org> <57D06430.1080503@wtnet.de> <011b01d20941$dfab85d0$9f029170$@acm.org> In-Reply-To: <011b01d20941$dfab85d0$9f029170$@acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 20:16:05 -0000 Am 09/07/2016 09:56 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.mail@wtnet.de] >> Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2016 12:02 >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >> Subject: Re: ooo-site "Participation/Help-Wanted" structure (was RE: >> What would OpenOffice NON-retirement involve?) >> >> Am 09/05/2016 12:49 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: > [ ... ] >>> 3d. My second question is, why is >> not, the material at >>> > site/trunk/content/xx/participate/index.mdtext> used. That page was >> created in August 2013 (also by robweir) and has been part of fixes made >> as recently as 2014. This xx area is perfect for localization usage, >> and would allow others to create localized versions, it seems to me. >>> Again, if this folder is not actually used on the site, should it >> not be deleted from the current SVN trunk? >>> My preference would be for the xx to be used so that the >> opportunity for localizations in other languages, not just German, could >> be handled in what appears to be the standard way. >> >> I don't know. I think it was simply not used. If there was a decision >> then it is years ago. But you are contributor as long as me for this >> project. So, you could know it also - or even not. ;-) >> >> I know we had decided that we use the w.oo.o domain for the software and >> just a little for the project. With oo.a.o it was the opposite. Over the >> years this limitation got a bit more fuzzy and the both webpages can be >> one of this fuzziness. >> >> In order to anticipate your next question: >> >> Yes, we can change it. I would also go for the >> "xx/participate/index.mdtext" webpage as it can be localized and >> integrated into the localized webpages. Then the user can get approached >> in their own language which is - of course - more effective than to >> speak in English only. > [orcmid] > > Great! I think that would be a better way forward. to start a bit easier I would first copy & paste the content from "get-involved.html". Put the - now known - main problems and requirements first und put thinks like donation at the bottom. And then add new things into the right order. If there is no volunteer faster, then I will start beginning or at the weekend. Marcus --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org